IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v183y2017icp35-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance indicators to assess the implementation of automation in golf courses located in Southeast Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Melián-Navarro, A.
  • Molina-Martínez, J.M.
  • Rodríguez-Díaz, J.A.
  • Ruiz-Canales, A.

Abstract

Generally, in most pressure irrigation systems and particularly in irrigation systems of golf courses, an efficient management of water and energy use is required. Through an efficient management of these resources the excessive consumptions are controlled and a savings in exploitation costs could be achieved. One of the tools that allow controlling and identifying the water and energy consumption is the use of management and automation indicators. With the employ of these tools, several parameters that affect in the efficiency of water and energy use of pumping systems, water network configuration, automation and the associated energy systems could be controlled. In this paper the methodology and implementation of several water, energy and automation indicators and their productivity adapted to four golf courses in south-east Spain are shown. For this purpose, some data of a developed study among 2008 and 2011 in the irrigation systems of these golf courses and their influence in the improvement of the efficiency in the water and energy use are presented. This combined methodology is particularly suitable for comparing the irrigation systems of several golf courses. Moreover, by using these indicators with automation and remote control devices for water and energy management in such irrigation systems, it is possible to reduce and control associated costs. The results demonstrate that automation is a low-cost investment (with a maximum of 2% of the total costs) compared to the large benefits and advantages. For this study, the maximum values of the automation cost per controlled water volume and energy were 0.2007 €·m−3 and 0.2233 €·kWh−1, respectively. The percentage of automation cost in the total cost is around 1.5 percent.

Suggested Citation

  • Melián-Navarro, A. & Molina-Martínez, J.M. & Rodríguez-Díaz, J.A. & Ruiz-Canales, A., 2017. "Performance indicators to assess the implementation of automation in golf courses located in Southeast Spain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 35-40.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:183:y:2017:i:c:p:35-40
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.11.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377416304607
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.11.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Molden, D. J. & Sakthivadivel, R. & Perry, C. J. & de Fraiture, C. & Kloezen, W. H., 1998. "Indicators for comparing performance of irrigated agricultural systems," IWMI Research Reports H022308, International Water Management Institute.
    2. Molden, David J. & Sakthivadivel, Ramasamy & Perry, Christopher J. & de Fraiture, Charlotte & Kloezen, Wim H., 1998. "Indicators for comparing performance of irrigated agricultural systems," IWMI Research Reports 44581, International Water Management Institute.
    3. García-González, J.F. & Moreno, M.A. & Molina, J.M. & Madueño, A. & Ruiz-Canales, A., 2015. "Use of software to model the water and energy use of an irrigation pipe network on a golf course," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 37-42.
    4. Carrow, Robert N., 2006. "Can we maintain turf to customers' satisfaction with less water?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 80(1-3), pages 117-131, February.
    5. Fernández-Pacheco, D.G. & Ferrández-Villena, M. & Molina-Martínez, J.M. & Ruiz-Canales, A., 2015. "Performance indicators to assess the implementation of automation in water user associations: A case study in southeast Spain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 87-92.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sláma, Jiří & Bystřický, Václav & Štych, Přemysl & Fialová, Dana & Svobodová, Lenka & Kvítek, Tomáš, 2018. "Golf courses: New phenomena in the landscape of the Czech Republic after 1990," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 430-446.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghahroodi, E. Mokari & Noory, H. & Liaghat, A.M., 2015. "Performance evaluation study and hydrologic and productive analysis of irrigation systems at the Qazvin irrigation network (Iran)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 189-195.
    2. Bastiaanssen, W. G. M. & Ahmad, Mobin-ud-Din & Tahir, Z., 2003. "Upscaling water productivity in irrigated agriculture using remote-sensing and GIS technologies," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    3. Unal, H. B. & Asik, S. & Avci, M. & Yasar, S. & Akkuzu, E., 2004. "Performance of water delivery system at tertiary canal level: a case study of the Menemen Left Bank Irrigation System, Gediz Basin, Turkey," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 155-171, March.
    4. repec:kqi:journl:2017-2-1-2 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Playan, Enrique & Mateos, Luciano, 2006. "Modernization and optimization of irrigation systems to increase water productivity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 80(1-3), pages 100-116, February.
    6. Mohammed Mainuddin & Mac Kirby, 2009. "Agricultural productivity in the lower Mekong Basin: trends and future prospects for food security," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 1(1), pages 71-82, February.
    7. Uysal, Özlem Karahan & AtIs, Ela, 2010. "Assessing the performance of participatory irrigation management over time: A case study from Turkey," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(7), pages 1017-1025, July.
    8. Mohamed Kharrou & Michel Le Page & Ahmed Chehbouni & Vincent Simonneaux & Salah Er-Raki & Lionel Jarlan & Lahcen Ouzine & Said Khabba & Ghani Chehbouni, 2013. "Assessment of Equity and Adequacy of Water Delivery in Irrigation Systems Using Remote Sensing-Based Indicators in Semi-Arid Region, Morocco," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(13), pages 4697-4714, October.
    9. Alaerts, G.J., 2020. "Adaptive policy implementation: Process and impact of Indonesia’s national irrigation reform 1999–2018," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    10. Lecina, S. & Isidoro, D. & Playán, E. & Aragüés, R., 2010. "Irrigation modernization and water conservation in Spain: The case of Riegos del Alto Aragón," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(10), pages 1663-1675, October.
    11. Kukul, Y.S. & Akçay, S. & Anaç, S. & YesilIrmak, E., 2008. "Temporal irrigation performance assessment in Turkey: Menemen case study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(9), pages 1090-1098, September.
    12. Montazar, Aliasghar & Gheidari, Omid Nasiri & Snyder, Richard L., 2013. "A fuzzy analytical hierarchy methodology for the performance assessment of irrigation projects," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 113-123.
    13. Place, Frank & Kariuki, Gatarwa & Wangila, Justine & Kristjanson, Patricia & Makauki, Adolf & Ndubi, Jessica, 2004. "Assessing the factors underlying differences in achievements of farmer groups: methodological issues and empirical findings from the highlands of Central Kenya," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 257-272, December.
    14. Zema, Demetrio Antonio & Nicotra, Angelo & Mateos, Luciano & Zimbone, Santo Marcello, 2018. "Improvement of the irrigation performance in Water Users Associations integrating data envelopment analysis and multi-regression models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 38-49.
    15. Cook, Simon, 2006. "Agricultural water productivity: issues, concepts and approaches," IWMI Working Papers H039744, International Water Management Institute.
    16. Igbadun, Henry E. & Mahoo, Henry F. & Tarimo, Andrew K.P.R. & Salim, Baanda A., 2006. "Crop water productivity of an irrigated maize crop in Mkoji sub-catchment of the Great Ruaha River Basin, Tanzania," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(1-2), pages 141-150, September.
    17. Zhang, Lei & Heerink, Nico & Dries, Liesbeth & Shi, Xiaoping, 2013. "Water users associations and irrigation water productivity in northern China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 128-136.
    18. Zhou, Qing & Zhang, Yali & Wu, Feng, 2021. "Evaluation of the most proper management scale on water use efficiency and water productivity: A case study of the Heihe River Basin, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    19. Luquet, Delphine & Vidal, Alain & Smith, Martin & Dauzat, Jean, 2005. "`More crop per drop': how to make it acceptable for farmers?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 108-119, August.
    20. Bastiaanssen, W. & Ahmad, Mobin-ud -Din & Tahir, Z., 2003. "Upscaling water productivity in irrigated agriculture using remote-sensing and GIS technologies," IWMI Books, Reports H032648, International Water Management Institute.
    21. Nascimento, A.K & Schwartz, R.C. & Lima, F.A & López-Mata, E. & Domínguez, A. & Izquiel, A. & Tarjuelo, J.M & Martínez-Romero, A, 2019. "Effects of irrigation uniformity on yield response and production economics of maize in a semiarid zone," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 178-189.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:183:y:2017:i:c:p:35-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.