IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v156y2015icp10-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumptive water use and crop coefficients for warm-season turfgrass species in the Southeastern United States

Author

Listed:
  • Wherley, B.
  • Dukes, M.D.
  • Cathey, S.
  • Miller, G.
  • Sinclair, T.

Abstract

Increased urban demand for landscape irrigation, as well as interest in promoting water-use efficient species by municipalities, water purveyors, and homeowners associations emphasize the need for comparative data on consumptive water use by warm-season lawn grasses. The objective of this study was to quantify actual evapotranspiration (ETa) and to develop crop coefficients (Kc) for four warm-season turfgrass species, namely ‘Tifway’ bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. x Cynodon transvaalensis Burtt-Davy), ‘Empire’ zoysiagrass (Zoysia japonica Steud.), ‘Floratam’ St. Augustinegrass [Stenotaphrum secundatum (Walter) Kuntze], and ‘Argentine’ bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flugge). Crop coefficients were derived by dividing ETa (measured directly from lysimeter weight change over 24 to 72-h periods) by reference evapotranspiration (ETo) calculated from the ASCE–EWRI Standardized Method using onsite weather station data. Data were collected over three seasons from non-stressed, well-watered turf. For 17 of the 30 measurement periods, Kc did not differ among the 4 species, and on 24 of 30 periods zoysiagrass, bermudagrass, and St. Augustinegrass Kc did not differ from one another. A trend toward elevated Kc was observed in bahiagrass in years 2 and 3, particularly during early spring measurement periods. Kc values for all species fluctuated across seasons and years, peaking to ∼0.8 during active growth periods when vapor pressure deficit and solar radiation were greatest, and declining to ∼0.3 in late fall and winter. Root growth differences among the species appeared to have a stronger relationship to ET rates than did shoot growth rate. Results demonstrated that the commonly recommended warm-season turf coefficient of 0.6, while approximating overall average annual ETa, under-predicted ETa during active growth periods and over-predicted ETa during late fall and winter periods, when turf was slowly growing or quiescent. The results indicate seasonal refinement of Kc values may be needed to more effectively meet consumptive water use requirements of warm-season turfgrasses.

Suggested Citation

  • Wherley, B. & Dukes, M.D. & Cathey, S. & Miller, G. & Sinclair, T., 2015. "Consumptive water use and crop coefficients for warm-season turfgrass species in the Southeastern United States," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 10-18.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:156:y:2015:i:c:p:10-18
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.03.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377415001031
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.03.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haghverdi, Amir & Singh, Amninder & Sapkota, Anish & Reiter, Maggie & Ghodsi, Somayeh, 2021. "Developing irrigation water conservation strategies for hybrid bermudagrass using an evapotranspiration-based smart irrigation controller in inland southern California," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    2. Pinnix, Garland D. & Miller, Grady L., 2019. "Comparing evapotranspiration rates of tall fescue and bermudagrass in North Carolina," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:156:y:2015:i:c:p:10-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.