IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v116y2013icp50-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of climate change scenarios on crop yield and water footprint of maize in the Po valley of Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Bocchiola, D.
  • Nana, E.
  • Soncini, A.

Abstract

We studied the effect of prospective climate change upon crop yield, and related water footprint of maize (Zea mays L.) for a relevant case study area in the Po valley of Northern Italy. To simulate maize production we used a cropping system simulation model CropSyst, which we set up and validated by way of crop yield data during 2001–2010. We then calculated the present water footprint (green, blue) of maize in the area, defined as the absolute and specific (per kg yield) amount of water evapotranspired during growing season, under three irrigation scenarios, namely (i) no irrigation, (ii) manual irrigation at fixed dates, and (iii) automatic irrigation on demand. We then evaluated the effects of prospective climate change upon maize production until mid-century (2045–2054), and we quantified the water footprint therein. We considered climate variations with focus upon temperature, precipitation, and CO2. First, we assessed maize yield and water footprint sensitivity to potential changes of these weather variables. We then fed the maize yield model with properly downscaled climate projections (storyline A2, business as usual) from global circulation models (GCM), included within the board of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change, IPCC, and with those from a local scenario LOC, obtained by projecting recently observed local climate trends (1975–2010). Under the worst, more likely future scenarios of increasing temperature and decreasing precipitation, crop yield decreased and water footprint, especially blue, increased, due to increased evapotranspiration, higher irrigation demand, and lower final yield. Increase of CO2, albeit possibly increasing water use efficiency, seemed not to affect the water footprint noticeably. A possible increase of precipitation as projected by some GCMs, may partly make up for the increase of temperature, especially under a no, or little irrigation scenario, further diminishing the blue water footprint. Uncertainty in future precipitation has the greatest impact in scenarios projecting maize yield and water footprint. Our study provides hints as to how one can (i) evaluate the amount of water required to cultivate maize or other crops, and virtually traded when such crops are sold or bought, (ii) evaluate the impact of climate change upon water footprint and virtual water trade, and (iii) benchmark objectively adaptation strategies for agricultural systems with an eye on least water consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Bocchiola, D. & Nana, E. & Soncini, A., 2013. "Impact of climate change scenarios on crop yield and water footprint of maize in the Po valley of Italy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 50-61.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:116:y:2013:i:c:p:50-61
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.10.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377412002569
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.10.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stockle, Claudio O. & Williams, Jimmy R. & Rosenberg, Norman J. & Jones, C. Allan, 1992. "A method for estimating the direct and climatic effects of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide on growth and yield of crops: Part I--Modification of the EPIC model for climate change analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 225-238.
    2. Aldaya, M.M. & Hoekstra, A.Y., 2010. "The water needed for Italians to eat pasta and pizza," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(6), pages 351-360, July.
    3. Confalonieri, Roberto & Acutis, Marco & Bellocchi, Gianni & Donatelli, Marcello, 2009. "Multi-metric evaluation of the models WARM, CropSyst, and WOFOST for rice," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(11), pages 1395-1410.
    4. Galelli, S. & Gandolfi, C. & Soncini-Sessa, R. & Agostani, D., 2010. "Building a metamodel of an irrigation district distributed-parameter model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 187-200, February.
    5. Supit, I. & van Diepen, C.A. & de Wit, A.J.W. & Kabat, P. & Baruth, B. & Ludwig, F., 2010. "Recent changes in the climatic yield potential of various crops in Europe," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(9), pages 683-694, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nana, E. & Corbari, C. & Bocchiola, D., 2014. "A model for crop yield and water footprint assessment: Study of maize in the Po valley," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 139-149.
    2. Bocchiola, D. & Brunetti, L. & Soncini, A. & Polinelli, F. & Gianinetto, M., 2019. "Impact of climate change on agricultural productivity and food security in the Himalayas: A case study in Nepal," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 113-125.
    3. Bocchiola, D., 2015. "Impact of potential climate change on crop yield and water footprint of rice in the Po valley of Italy," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 223-237.
    4. Palazzoli, I. & Maskey, S. & Uhlenbrook, S. & Nana, E. & Bocchiola, D., 2015. "Impact of prospective climate change on water resources and crop yields in the Indrawati basin, Nepal," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 143-157.
    5. Tiecheng Bai & Nannan Zhang & Youqi Chen & Benoit Mercatoris, 2019. "Assessing the Performance of the WOFOST Model in Simulating Jujube Fruit Tree Growth under Different Irrigation Regimes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, March.
    6. María Jesús Beltrán & Esther Velázquez, 2011. "Del metabolismo social al metabolismo hídrico," Documentos de Trabajo de la Asociación de Economía Ecológica en España 01_2011, Asociación de Economía Ecológica en España.
    7. Cabelguenne, M. & Debaeke, P. & Bouniols, A., 1999. "EPICphase, a version of the EPIC model simulating the effects of water and nitrogen stress on biomass and yield, taking account of developmental stages: validation on maize, sunflower, sorghum, soybea," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 175-196, June.
    8. Mitter, Hermine & Schmid, Erwin, 2021. "Informing groundwater policies in semi-arid agricultural production regions under stochastic climate scenario impacts," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    9. Masseroni, Daniele & Gangi, Fabiola & Galli, Andrea & Ceriani, Rodolfo & De Gaetani, Carlo & Gandolfi, Claudio, 2022. "Behind the efficiency of border irrigation: Lesson learned in Northern Italy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    10. Wang, Zhiqiang & Ye, Li & Jiang, Jingyi & Fan, Yida & Zhang, Xiaoran, 2022. "Review of application of EPIC crop growth model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 467(C).
    11. Melkonian, J. & Riha, S. J. & Wilks, D. S., 1998. "Simulation of elevated CO2 effects on daily net canopy carbon assimilation and crop yield," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 87-106, September.
    12. Kaisheng Luo & Fulu Tao & Juana P. Moiwo, 2018. "Transfer of Virtual Water of Woody Forest Products from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, February.
    13. Wang, Zhaozhi & Zhang, T.Q. & Tan, C.S. & Taylor, R.A.J. & Wang, X. & Qi, Z.M. & Welacky, T., 2018. "Simulating crop yield, surface runoff, tile drainage and phosphorus loss in a clay loam soil of the Lake Erie region using EPIC," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 212-221.
    14. Witold GRZEBISZ & Pavel ČERMÁK & Evan RROCO & Witold SZCZEPANIAK & Jarosław POTARZYCKI & György FÜLEKY, 2017. "Potassium impact on nitrogen use efficiency in potato - a case study from the Central-East Europe," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(9), pages 422-427.
    15. Yang, Gaiqiang & Liu, Lei & Guo, Ping & Li, Mo, 2017. "A flexible decision support system for irrigation scheduling in an irrigation district in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 378-389.
    16. Marc Audi & Amjad Ali & Mohamad Kassem, 2020. "Greenhouse Gases: A Review of Losses and Benefits," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(1), pages 403-418.
    17. Schmidtner, Eva & Dabbert, Stephan & Lippert, Christian, 2015. "Do Different Measurements of Soil Quality Influence the Results of a Ricardian Analysis? – A Case Study on the Effects of Climate Change on German Agriculture," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 64(02), June.
    18. Bonfante, A. & Basile, A. & Acutis, M. & De Mascellis, R. & Manna, P. & Perego, A. & Terribile, F., 2010. "SWAP, CropSyst and MACRO comparison in two contrasting soils cropped with maize in Northern Italy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(7), pages 1051-1062, July.
    19. Gilardelli, Carlo & Confalonieri, Roberto & Cappelli, Giovanni Alessandro & Bellocchi, Gianni, 2018. "Sensitivity of WOFOST-based modelling solutions to crop parameters under climate change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 1-14.
    20. Marta Antonelli & Luca Fernando Ruini, 2015. "Business Engagement with Sustainable Water Resource Management through Water Footprint Accounting: The Case of the Barilla Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-17, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:116:y:2013:i:c:p:50-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.