IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v99y2008i1p6-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of a dynamic programming model to estimate the value of clinical mastitis treatment and prevention options utilized by dairy producers

Author

Listed:
  • Bar, D.
  • Tauer, L.W.
  • Bennett, G.
  • González, R.N.
  • Hertl, J.A.
  • Schulte, H.F.
  • Schukken, Y.H.
  • Welcome, F.L.
  • Gröhn, Y.T.

Abstract

This study discusses and demonstrates the construction and application of a specially structured dynamic programming replacement and insemination optimization and simulation model of the dairy cow that includes detailed representation of repeated episodes of clinical mastitis (CM). The application determined optimal individual cow decisions, which were then compared with mastitis culling rules of thumb to determine the deviation of these rules from optimality. Calculation of break-even values of applying a preventive measure to reduce CM incidence or severity in the form of two fictitious mastitis vaccines were also carried out. Model input parameters were based on data from five large dairy herds in New York State (about 16,000 lactations), but these parameters can be easily changed for other types of dairy operations. To demonstrate the usefulness of this model to assist individual cow CM treatment options, the cost of the decision to cull a third lactation cow, six months after calving, with the first case of CM, was negative $3 USD for a low milk producing open or pregnant cow (i.e. cull), and positive $850 USD for a high milk producing and pregnant cow (i.e. treat even with extremely high treatment cost). Compared with the model recommended optimal policy, a rule of thumb decision to routinely treat all cows with a first case of CM resulted in an additional cost of $2 per cow per year, a very low deviation from optimality and suggests all cows should be given a second chance. A policy of replacing all CM cows after their second CM case after treatment of the first CM incident resulted in an additional cost of $27 per cow per year. If the decision was to replace all cows only after their third CM case this cost estimate was $8. The cost-benefit of applying two fictitious vaccinations showed that a vaccination reducing the milk loss caused by Gram-negative CM by 50% had a break-even cost of $14 per cow per year. A vaccination that would result in additional reduction of the risk of CM by 50% had a break-even cost of $37 per cow per year.

Suggested Citation

  • Bar, D. & Tauer, L.W. & Bennett, G. & González, R.N. & Hertl, J.A. & Schulte, H.F. & Schukken, Y.H. & Welcome, F.L. & Gröhn, Y.T., 2008. "Use of a dynamic programming model to estimate the value of clinical mastitis treatment and prevention options utilized by dairy producers," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 6-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:99:y:2008:i:1:p:6-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308-521X(08)00094-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A.W. Stott & G.M. Jones & G.J. Gunn & M. Chase‐Topping & R.W. Humphry & H. Richardson & D.N. Logue, 2002. "Optimum Replacement Policies for the Control of Subclinical Mastitis due to S.aureus in Dairy Cows," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 627-644, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stott, Alistair W., 2006. "Optimisation methods for assisting policy decisions on endemic diseases," Working Papers 46000, Scotland's Rural College (formerly Scottish Agricultural College), Land Economy & Environment Research Group.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:99:y:2008:i:1:p:6-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.