IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v100y2009i1-3p72-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integration of geospatial and cattle nutrition information to estimate paddock grazing capacity in Northern US prairie

Author

Listed:
  • Phillips, Rebecca
  • Beeri, Ofer
  • Scholljegerdes, Eric
  • Bjergaard, David
  • Hendrickson, John

Abstract

Spatiotemporal variability in forage quantity and quality requires that regular assessment is needed of the capacity for grasslands to support livestock nutritional requirements. Current methods for estimating grazing capacity are typically production-based and lack the forage quality data necessary to match nutrients in forage with livestock requirements in real time. This paper describes a method for estimating short-term grazing capacity for small (1-20 ha) paddocks using cattle nutrition and high spatial resolution forage data in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for mixed-grass prairie. We define grazing capacity as the number of days a specific paddock will support the nutritional requirements of beef cattle. We integrate previously published methods for estimating cattle nutritional requirements, forage quality (crude protein) and forage quantity (phytomass) to estimate grazing capacity based on current standing-crop. The model utilizes high-resolution (

Suggested Citation

  • Phillips, Rebecca & Beeri, Ofer & Scholljegerdes, Eric & Bjergaard, David & Hendrickson, John, 2009. "Integration of geospatial and cattle nutrition information to estimate paddock grazing capacity in Northern US prairie," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 100(1-3), pages 72-79, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:100:y:2009:i:1-3:p:72-79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308-521X(09)00004-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diaz-Solis, H. & Kothmann, M.M. & Grant, W.E. & De Luna-Villarreal, R., 2006. "Application of a simple ecological sustainability simulator (SESS) as a management tool in the semi-arid rangelands of northeastern Mexico," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 88(2-3), pages 514-527, June.
    2. Grigera, Gonzalo & Oesterheld, Martin & Pacin, Fernando, 2007. "Monitoring forage production for farmers' decision making," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 637-648, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Della Nave, Facundo N. & Ojeda, Jonathan J. & Irisarri, J. Gonzalo N. & Pembleton, Keith & Oyarzabal, Mariano & Oesterheld, Martín, 2022. "Calibrating APSIM for forage sorghum using remote sensing and field data under sub-optimal growth conditions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gutiérrez, Francisco & Gallego, Federico & Paruelo, José M. & Rodríguez, Claudia, 2020. "Damping and lag effects of precipitation variability across trophic levels in Uruguayan rangelands," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    2. Nasca, J.A. & Feldkamp, C.R. & Arroquy, J.I. & Colombatto, D., 2015. "Efficiency and stability in subtropical beef cattle grazing systems in the northwest of Argentina," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 85-96.
    3. Teague, W.R. & Kreuter, U.P. & Grant, W.E. & Diaz-Solis, H. & Kothmann, M.M., 2009. "Economic implications of maintaining rangeland ecosystem health in a semi-arid savanna," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 1417-1429, March.
    4. Irisarri, J.G.N. & Oesterheld, M., 2020. "Temporal variation of stocking rate and primary production in the face of drought and land use change," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    5. Della Nave, Facundo N. & Ojeda, Jonathan J. & Irisarri, J. Gonzalo N. & Pembleton, Keith & Oyarzabal, Mariano & Oesterheld, Martín, 2022. "Calibrating APSIM for forage sorghum using remote sensing and field data under sub-optimal growth conditions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    6. Pacín, Fernando & Oesterheld, Martín, 2015. "Closing the technological gap of animal and crop production through technical assistance," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 101-107.
    7. Teague, W.R. & Grant, W.E. & Kreuter, U.P. & Diaz-Solis, H. & Dube, S. & Kothmann, M.M. & Pinchak, W.E. & Ansley, R.J., 2008. "An ecological economic simulation model for assessing fire and grazing management effects on mesquite rangelands in Texas," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 611-624, January.
    8. Becona, Gonzalo & Astigarraga, Laura & Picasso, Valentin D., 2014. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Beef Cow-Calf Grazing Systems in Uruguay," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 3(2).
    9. Paruelo, José M. & Texeira, Marcos & Tomasel, Fernando, 2024. "Hybrid modeling for grassland productivity prediction: A parametric and machine learning technique for grazing management with applicability to digital twin decision systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    10. Müller, Birgit & Schulze, Jule & Kreuer, David & Linstädter, Anja & Frank, Karin, 2015. "How to avoid unsustainable side effects of managing climate risk in drylands — The supplementary feeding controversy," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 153-165.
    11. Bilotto, Franco & Recavarren, Paulo & Vibart, Ronaldo & Machado, Claudio F., 2019. "Backgrounding strategy effects on farm productivity, profitability and greenhouse gas emissions of cow-calf systems in the Flooding Pampas of Argentina," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    12. Grigera, Gonzalo & Oesterheld, Martin & Pacin, Fernando, 2007. "Monitoring forage production for farmers' decision making," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 637-648, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:100:y:2009:i:1-3:p:72-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.