IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ecr/col070/47289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La dinámica del empleo rural en el Brasil: un análisis mediante modelos de panel dinámico

Author

Listed:
  • Khan, Ahmad Saeed
  • Paulo, Evânio Mascarenhas
  • Rocha, Leonardo Andrade
  • Tabosa, Francisco José Silva

Abstract

En este artículo se abordan algunos aspectos de la calidad del empleo en el Brasil, en particular el empleo rural. Se parte de la percepción de cambios en las relaciones de producción en el campo y sus repercusiones en las relaciones de trabajo. Se aplica una metodología de datos de panel que capta los condicionantes de esta calidad y se propone un índice de calidad del empleo. El universo rural constituye un ambiente más precario que el urbano, aunque las diferencias estén disminuyendo con el tiempo. Respecto del empleo agrícola, el crecimiento económico de la década de 2000 se traduce solo en la extensión de las condiciones existentes a los nuevos contratos, sin modificar la calidad media del empleo. El aumento de los ingresos del trabajo y el nivel de educación son instrumentos importantes para aumentar los niveles de calidad del empleo y superar problemas como la heterogeneidad entre grupos.

Suggested Citation

  • Khan, Ahmad Saeed & Paulo, Evânio Mascarenhas & Rocha, Leonardo Andrade & Tabosa, Francisco José Silva, 2021. "La dinámica del empleo rural en el Brasil: un análisis mediante modelos de panel dinámico," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecr:col070:47289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/47289
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yanira Marcela Oviedo-Gil & Favio Ernesto Cala Vitery, 2023. "Teleworking and Job Quality in Latin American Countries: A Comparison from an Impact Approach in 2021," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecr:col070:47289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Biblioteca CEPAL (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eclaccl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.