IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ3/2017-05-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Indonesian Crab Export Competitiveness in International Market

Author

Listed:
  • Harsuko Riniwati

    (Fisheries and Marine Science Faculty, Brawijaya University Malang, Indonesia)

  • Nuddin Harahab

    (Fisheries and Marine Science Faculty, Brawijaya University Malang, Indonesia)

  • T. Yohana Carla

    (Fisheries and Marine Science Faculty, Brawijaya University Malang, Indonesia.)

Abstract

The purpose of this research were as follows: to know and analyze the market structure and competition of Indonesian crab, comparative advantage, competitive advantage, and crab trading specialization in international market. The analytical method used were the Concentration Ratio and Herfindahl Index, Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA), Porter Diamond Theory and Trade Specialization Index. The results showed that within 2005 - 2014 the market structure of fresh crabs in the international market was monopolistic which was lead by the moderate power of oligopoly market leader. The analysis results of Comparative Advantage Indonesian crabs during 2005 – 2014 period for fresh crabs highlighted a high advantage of RCA value of 21.43. Furthermore, the results of competitive advantage analysis of Porter Diamond Theory stated that the following items owned a high competitive strength; they were natural resources, demand conditions, the role of government and the role of opportunity. Next, the value of Trade Specialization Index for fresh crab and crab processed Indonesia obtained high specialization value of 0.99 and 0.97 respectively, on the other hand, frozen crab was still in its period of growth. It had 0.4 value.

Suggested Citation

  • Harsuko Riniwati & Nuddin Harahab & T. Yohana Carla, 2017. "Analysis of Indonesian Crab Export Competitiveness in International Market," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(5), pages 23-27.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ3:2017-05-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/download/5576/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/view/5576/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bender, Siegfried & Li, Kui-Wai, 2002. "The Changing Trade and Revealed Comparative Advantages of Asian and Latin American Manufacture Exports," Center Discussion Papers 28478, Yale University, Economic Growth Center.
    2. Amita Batra & Zeba Khan, 2005. "Revealed comparative advantage: An analysis for India and China," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Papers 168, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goldar, Amrita & Bhanot, Jaya & Shimpo, Kazushige, 2011. "Prioritizing towards a green export portfolio for India: An environmental input–output approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 7036-7048.
    2. Manzano, George N. & Martin, Kristine Joy, 2015. "Implications of a Philippine-US Free Trade Agreement on Trade in Goods: An Indicator Approach," Discussion Papers DP 2015-42, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    3. Sadaf Shahab & Muhammad Tariq Mahmood, 2013. "Comparative Advantage of Leather Industry in Pakistan with Selected Asian Economies," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 3(1), pages 133-139.
    4. Hiranya K. Nath & Binoy Goswami, 2018. "India’s comparative advantages in services trade," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 8(2), pages 323-342, August.
    5. Makochekanwa, Albert, 2007. "Botswana’s revealed comparative advantage," MPRA Paper 34564, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Manzano, George N. & Martin, Kristine Joy, 2015. "Implications of a Philippine-US Free Trade Agreement on Trade in Goods: An Indicator Approach," Research Paper Series DP 2015-42, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    7. Zehra Vildan Serin & Seda Yeldan, 2023. "Determining the Competitiveness of Türkiye’s Selected Defense Products: A Revealed Comparative Advantage and Comparative Export Performance," Journal of Economic Policy Researches, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 10(2), pages 485-503, July.
    8. Andrea Zaghini, 2006. "Commercial Specialisation in the Countries of Central-Eastern Europe," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 3, July.
    9. Javeria Maryam & Ashok Mittal, 2019. "An empirical analysis of India’s trade in goods with BRICS," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 66(4), pages 399-421, December.
    10. Usman Ali & Faizan Ahmad & Lida Ormal, 2018. "Trade Compatibility between Afghanistan and India : An empirical Evaluation," Kardan Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, Kardan University, Department of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 11-12, January.
    11. Nath, Hiranya K. & Liu, Lirong & Tochkov, Kiril, 2015. "Comparative advantages in U.S. bilateral services trade with China and India," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 79-92.
    12. Stefanescu, Razvan & Dumitriu, Ramona, 2014. "Investigation on the relationship between Romanian foreign trade and industrial production," MPRA Paper 62547, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Mohammad Ali Feizpour & Abolfazl Shahmohammadi Mehrjardi, 2014. "Comparative Advantages and Sustainable Development in Iranian Manufacturing Industries," Iranian Economic Review (IER), Faculty of Economics,University of Tehran.Tehran,Iran, vol. 18(1), pages 33-52, Winter.
    14. Binoy Goswami & Hiranya K. Nath, 2021. "India'S Revealed Comparative Advantages In Merchandise Trade With Country Groups At Different Levels Of Development," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 39(2), pages 377-397, April.
    15. repec:lje:journl:v:20:y:2015:i:1:p:157-168 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Sarath Chandran, B.P., 2010. "Trade Complementarity and Similarity Between India and Asean Countries in the context of the RTA," MPRA Paper 29279, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Depetris Guiguet, Edith & García Arancibia, Rodrigo & Rossini, Gustavo, 2010. "Consistencia de indicadores de especialización en el comercio internacional. Aplicación al caso de la mantequilla en Argentina y Uruguay = Consistency of Specialization Indicators. An Application to A," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 9(1), pages 85-105, June.
    18. Escaith, Hubert, 2007. "Old and new dualisms in Latin America and Asia: labour productivity, international competitiveness and income distribution," MPRA Paper 14510, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2008.
    19. Bagaria, Nidhi & Santra, Swarup & Kumar, Rajesh, 2014. "A study on variation in comparative advantage in trade between China and India," MPRA Paper 53287, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Zaghini, Andrea, 2003. "Trade advantages and specialisation dynamics in acceding countries," Working Paper Series 249, European Central Bank.
    21. Waqar Akhtar & M. Sharif & Hassnain Shah, 2009. "Competitiveness of Pakistani Fruits in the World Market," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 125-133, Jul-Dec.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Indonesian Crab; Concentration Ratio; Trade Specialization Index.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ3:2017-05-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.