IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/2021-04-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transition of Electric Mobility in Colombia: Technical and Economic Evaluation of Scenarios for the Integration of E-taxis in Bucaramanga

Author

Listed:
  • Yecid Alfonso Mu oz Maldonado

    (Autonomous University of Bucaramanga UNAB, Colombia)

  • C sar Acevedo

    (Autonomous University of Bucaramanga UNAB, Colombia)

  • Edward Jerez

    (Autonomous University of Bucaramanga UNAB, Colombia)

  • Carlos Sarmiento

    (Autonomous University of Bucaramanga UNAB, Colombia)

  • Miguel De La Rosa

    (Autonomous University of Bucaramanga UNAB, Colombia)

  • Adalberto Ospino

    (University of the Coast CUC, Colombia.)

Abstract

Globally, the transport sector has been directed towards electric mobility by policies, regulations, development strategies and economic incentives. The transport sector has an important strategic role in the economic development of a country, the sustainability of this sector has an impact on political and scientific discussions due to its environmental impact. In Colombia, the global targets for reducing polluting emissions begin to drive the renewal of the automotive park towards electric mobility, therefore, this research was carried out with the aim of carrying out a technical and economic analysis of scenarios for the e-taxis in Bucaramanga, the incentives applied in the two projects developed in the two most important cities of Colombia were taken as the basis to compare possible implementation scenarios in the short and medium term. Three technologies (gasoline, gas and electric) were evaluated that were tested using the TAC/km indicator, the financial viability was assessed based on two financial kindness criteria (NPV and IRR). The results obtained allow to conclude two strategies that make it possible to incorporate the e-taxis in Bucaramanga, 1) exemption from payment of taxi registration, in case of incorporation of a new vehicle; 2) economic incentive of more than 20% at the time of purchase of the EV, accompanied by a 25% increase in the cost of the minimum service fee, in the case of the replacement of a taxi.

Suggested Citation

  • Yecid Alfonso Mu oz Maldonado & C sar Acevedo & Edward Jerez & Carlos Sarmiento & Miguel De La Rosa & Adalberto Ospino, 2021. "Transition of Electric Mobility in Colombia: Technical and Economic Evaluation of Scenarios for the Integration of E-taxis in Bucaramanga," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(4), pages 461-469.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2021-04-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/11084/5944
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/11084/5944
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philippe Crist, 2012. "Electric Vehicles Revisited: Costs, Subsidies and Prospects," International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2012/3, OECD Publishing.
    2. Yang, Jie & Dong, Jing & Hu, Liang, 2018. "Design government incentive schemes for promoting electric taxis in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1-11.
    3. Kuby, Michael, 2019. "The opposite of ubiquitous: How early adopters of fast-filling alt-fuel vehicles adapt to the sparsity of stations," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 46-57.
    4. Xingping Zhang & Jian Xie & Rao Rao & Yanni Liang, 2014. "Policy Incentives for the Adoption of Electric Vehicles across Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Jason Henderson, 2020. "EVs Are Not the Answer: A Mobility Justice Critique of Electric Vehicle Transitions," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(6), pages 1993-2010, November.
    6. Scorrano, Mariangela & Danielis, Romeo & Giansoldati, Marco, 2020. "Mandating the use of the electric taxis: The case of Florence," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 402-414.
    7. Hardman, Scott & Chandan, Amrit & Tal, Gil & Turrentine, Tom, 2017. "The effectiveness of financial purchase incentives for battery electric vehicles – A review of the evidence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1100-1111.
    8. Danielis, Romeo & Giansoldati, Marco & Rotaris, Lucia, 2018. "A probabilistic total cost of ownership model to evaluate the current and future prospects of electric cars uptake in Italy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 268-281.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scorrano, Mariangela & Danielis, Romeo & Giansoldati, Marco, 2020. "Mandating the use of the electric taxis: The case of Florence," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 402-414.
    2. Xiaohong Jiang & Xiucheng Guo, 2020. "Evaluation of Performance and Technological Characteristics of Battery Electric Logistics Vehicles: China as a Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Mariangela Scorrano & Romeo Danielis & Stefano Pastore & Vanni Lughi & Alessandro Massi Pavan, 2020. "Modeling the Total Cost of Ownership of an Electric Car Using a Residential Photovoltaic Generator and a Battery Storage Unit—An Italian Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Alali, Layla & Niesten, Eva & Gagliardi, Dimitri, 2022. "The impact of UK financial incentives on the adoption of electric fleets: The moderation effect of GDP change," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 200-220.
    5. Santos, Georgina & Rembalski, Sebastian, 2021. "Do electric vehicles need subsidies in the UK?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    6. Zhou, Min & Long, Piao & Kong, Nan & Zhao, Lindu & Jia, Fu & Campy, Kathryn S., 2021. "Characterizing the motivational mechanism behind taxi driver’s adoption of electric vehicles for living: Insights from China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 134-152.
    7. van Velzen, Arjan & Annema, Jan Anne & van de Kaa, Geerten & van Wee, Bert, 2019. "Proposing a more comprehensive future total cost of ownership estimation framework for electric vehicles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1034-1046.
    8. Kondev, Bozhil & Dixon, James & Zhou, Zhaoqi & Sabyrbekov, Rahat & Sultanaliev, Kanat & Hirmer, Stephanie A., 2023. "Putting the foot down: Accelerating EV uptake in Kyrgyzstan," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 87-96.
    9. Giansoldati, Marco & Monte, Adriana & Scorrano, Mariangela, 2020. "Barriers to the adoption of electric cars: Evidence from an Italian survey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    10. Proost, Stef & Van Dender, Kurt, 2012. "Energy and environment challenges in the transport sector," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 77-87.
    11. Bhardwaj, Chandan & Axsen, Jonn & Kern, Florian & McCollum, David, 2020. "Why have multiple climate policies for light-duty vehicles? Policy mix rationales, interactions and research gaps," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 309-326.
    12. Cailou Jiang & Ying Zhang & Maoliang Bu & Weishu Liu, 2018. "The Effectiveness of Government Subsidies on Manufacturing Innovation: Evidence from the New Energy Vehicle Industry in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-11, May.
    13. Iogansen, Xiatian & Wang, Kailai & Bunch, David & Matson, Grant & Circella, Giovanni, 2023. "Deciphering the factors associated with adoption of alternative fuel vehicles in California: An investigation of latent attitudes, socio-demographics, and neighborhood effects," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    14. Zhishuang Zhu & Hua Liao, 2019. "Do subsidies improve the financial performance of renewable energy companies? Evidence from China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 95(1), pages 241-256, January.
    15. Hyoung Jun Kim & Su Jung Jee & So Young Sohn, 2021. "Cost–benefit model for multi-generational high-technology products to compare sequential innovation strategy with quality strategy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, April.
    16. Guoqiang Zhang & Yanmei Xu & Juan Zhang, 2016. "Consumer-Oriented Policy towards Diffusion of Electric Vehicles: City-Level Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Thanh Tung Ha & Thanh Chuong Nguyen & Sy Sua Tu & Minh Hieu Nguyen, 2023. "Investigation of Influential Factors of Intention to Adopt Electric Vehicles for Motorcyclists in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, May.
    18. Nunes, Pedro & Farias, Tiago & Brito, Miguel C., 2015. "Day charging electric vehicles with excess solar electricity for a sustainable energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 263-274.
    19. Nie, Yu (Marco) & Ghamami, Mehrnaz & Zockaie, Ali & Xiao, Feng, 2016. "Optimization of incentive polices for plug-in electric vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 103-123.
    20. Bhandari, Vivek & Sun, Kaiyang & Homans, Frances, 2018. "The profitability of vehicle to grid for system participants - A case study from the Electricity Reliability Council of Texas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 278-286.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    electric taxi Colombia; e-taxi policies; electric mobility; electric vehicle; public transport sector.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q4 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy
    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2021-04-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.