IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ1/2024-03-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation and Audit Quality in South Africa: Practitioner and Academic Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Munkaila Aminu

    (University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa)

  • Bomi Cyril Nomlala

    (University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa)

  • Kiran Baldavoo

    (University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa)

Abstract

In this study, we examined the perceptions of practitioners and academics perspectives about the impact of mandatory audit firm rotation (MAFR) on audit quality (AQ) in South Africa within the province of KwaZulu-Natal. The paper considered the position of the European Union (EU) and the South African Independent Regulatory Body for Auditors (IRBA) regarding its policy shift on MAFR. The study examined the logical connection between MAFR and AQ. This was through the opinion of 101 practitioners and academics gathered from Tier 2 audit firms and two public institutions about the readiness of the rule in South Africa’s jurisdiction. We utilised a quantitative research method through descriptive statistics to understand the influence of the policy on AQ. Opinions of audit experts through closed-ended questionnaires were a distinct feature of our research, while analysis of the descriptive study was on the usage of feedback from respondents. Results from the data analysis presented provided a general overview of respondents’ opinions on the rule. Affirming our research aim, data from the majority of respondents agreed that the policy would strengthen AQ but maintained that the results of the additional imposition of cost could be worse. While this paper contributes to the existing literature on MAFR and AQ, it recommends that future research should consider the views of audit experts from different financial reporting ecosystems in South Africa to obtain diverse opinions regarding a framework that shall contribute to effective MAFR on AI and AQ.

Suggested Citation

  • Munkaila Aminu & Bomi Cyril Nomlala & Kiran Baldavoo, 2024. "Examining Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation and Audit Quality in South Africa: Practitioner and Academic Perspectives," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(3), pages 40-47, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2024-03-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/download/15036/7880
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/15036
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary Pflugrath & Nonna Martinov‐Bennie & Liang Chen, 2007. "The impact of codes of ethics and experience on auditor judgments," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(6), pages 566-589, July.
    2. Quick, Reiner & Aschauer, Ewald, 2018. "Mandatory Audit-Firm Rotation and Prohibition of Audit-Firm-Provided Tax Services: Evidence from Investment Consultants' Perceptions," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 110654, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. Jong-seo Choi & Hyoung-joo Lim & Dafydd Mali, 2017. "Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation and Big4 Effect on Audit Quality: Evidence from South Korea," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 13(1), pages 1-40.
    4. Francis, Jere R., 2004. "What do we know about audit quality?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 345-368.
    5. Mara Cameran & Annalisa Prencipe & Marco Trombetta, 2016. "Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation and Audit Quality," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 35-58, May.
    6. Michael Harber & Warren Maroun, 2020. "Mandatory audit firm rotation: a critical composition of practitioner views from an emerging economy," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(7), pages 861-896, July.
    7. Andrew B. Jackson & Michael Moldrich & Peter Roebuck, 2008. "Mandatory audit firm rotation and audit quality," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(5), pages 420-437, May.
    8. Inas Aisyah Widyaningsih & Iman Harymawan & Agus Widodo Mardijuwono & Eka Sari Ayuningtyas & Dyah Ayu Larasati, 2019. "Audit firm rotation and audit quality: Comparison before vs after the elimination of audit firm rotation regulations in Indonesia," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1695403-169, January.
    9. Dwi Martani & Nur Aulia Rahmah & Fitriany Fitriany & Viska Anggraita & Zhaojun Yang, 2021. "Impact of audit tenure and audit rotation on the audit quality: Big 4 vs non big 4," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 1901395-190, January.
    10. Jannie Rossouw & James Styan, 2019. "Steinhoff collapse: a failure of corporate governance," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 163-170, January.
    11. Persefoni Polychronidou & George Drogalas & Ioannis Tampakoudis, 2020. "Mandatory rotation of audit firms and auditors in Greece," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(2), pages 141-154, September.
    12. Cameran, Mara & Negri, Giulia & Pettinicchio, Angela, 2015. "The audit mandatory rotation rule: the state of the art," Journal of Financial Perspectives, EY Global FS Institute, vol. 3(2), pages 61-75.
    13. Msizi Gwala & Bomi Cyril Nomlala, 2021. "Mandatory audit firm rotation: A student perspective An assessment of the perceived impact on auditor independence," Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, Accounting Department, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 25(1), pages 1-11.
    14. DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth, 1981. "Auditor size and audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 183-199, December.
    15. Reiner Quick & Florian Schmidt, 2018. "Do audit firm rotation, auditor retention, and joint audits matter? – An experimental investigation of bank directors' and institutional investors' perceptions," Journal of Accounting Literature, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 41(1), pages 1-21, February.
    16. Quick, Reiner & Schmidt, F., 2018. "Do audit firm rotation, auditor retention, and joint audits matter? – An experimental investigation of bank directors' and institutional investors' perceptions," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 110650, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    17. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    18. repec:eme:maj000:maj-09-2019-2405 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Florio, Cristina, 2024. "A structured literature review of empirical research on mandatory auditor rotation," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    2. Jean Damascene Mvunabandi & Haruna Maama, 2023. "The Impact of Ethics on the Audit Quality of Firms in Sub-Sahara Africa," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 13(5), pages 119-127, September.
    3. repec:mth:ijafr8:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:450-461 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Puschmann, Lina Carine, 2019. "Die Rotation des verantwortlichen Prüfungspartners als Instrument zur Steigerung der Prüfungsqualität," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 4(4), pages 553-565.
    5. Persefoni Polychronidou & George Drogalas & Ioannis Tampakoudis, 2020. "Mandatory rotation of audit firms and auditors in Greece," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(2), pages 141-154, September.
    6. Friedrich, Christian & Quick, Reiner, 2024. "Do non-audit service failures impair auditor reputation? An analysis of KPMG advisory service scandals in Germany," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    7. Alhababsah, Salem & Alhaj-Ismail, Alaa, 2023. "Does shared tenure between audit committee chair and engagement partner affect audit outcomes? Evidence from the UK," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    8. Mihai Carp & Costel Istrate, 2021. "Audit Quality under Influences of Audit Firm and Auditee Characteristics: Evidence from the Romanian Regulated Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Curtis Hall & J. Scott Judd & Jayanthi Sunder, 2023. "Auditor conservatism, audit quality, and real consequences for clients," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 689-725, June.
    10. Aree Saeed MUSTAFA & Luqman Muhammed SAEED & Nishtiman Hashim MOHAMMED, 2018. "Auditor Selection in Borsa Istanbul," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 16(152), pages 599-599.
    11. Quick, Reiner & Schmidt, Florian, 2018. "Do audit firm rotation, auditor retention, and joint audits matter? – An experimental investigation of bank directors' and institutional investors' perceptions," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-21.
    12. Abdul Rahman Al Natour & Naim Salameh Al-Qadi & Rasmi Meqbel & Hala Zaidan & Hamzah Al-Mawali & Manaf Al-Okaily, 2023. "The Role of Privatisation in Sustaining Auditor Independence: Evidence from the Developing Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Reiner Quick & Niklas Schenk & Florian Schmidt & Thilo Towara, 2018. "The impact of corporate governance on auditor choice: evidence from Germany," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(2), pages 251-283, June.
    14. Alhababsah, Salem, 2019. "Ownership structure and audit quality: An empirical analysis considering ownership types in Jordan," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 71-84.
    15. Nahla Abdulrahman Mohammed Raweh & Hasnah Kamardin & Mazrah Malik @ Malek & Abdulwahid Ahmed Hashed Abdullah, 2021. "The Association between Audit Partner Busyness, Audit Partner Tenure, and Audit Efficiency," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 11(1), pages 90-103, January.
    16. Fakhroddin MohammadRezaei & Omid Faraji & Zabihollah Rezaee & Reza Gholami-Jamkarani & Mehdi Yari, 2024. "Substantive or symbolic compliance with regulation, audit fees and audit quality," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 32-51, March.
    17. Helmi A. Boshnak, 2021. "The Impact of Audit Committee Characteristics on Audit Quality: Evidence from Saudi Arabia," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 11(4), pages 1-12.
    18. Alhababsah, Salem & Yekini, Sina, 2021. "Audit committee and audit quality: An empirical analysis considering industry expertise, legal expertise and gender diversity," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    19. Agustín J. Sánchez-Medina & Félix Blázquez-Santana & Jesús B. Alonso, 2019. "Do Auditors Reflect the True Image of the Company Contrary to the Clients’ Interests? An Artificial Intelligence Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 529-545, March.
    20. Ku He & Xiaofei Pan & Gary Tian, 2017. "Legal Liability, Government Intervention, and Auditor Behavior: Evidence from Structural Reform of Audit Firms in China," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 61-95, January.
    21. Nguyen, Lily & Vu, Le & Yin, Xiangkang, 2020. "The undesirable effect of audit quality: Evidence from firm innovation," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Audit Quality; Audit Experts and Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation;

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing
    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2024-03-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.