IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ1/2018-04-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business Environmental Analysis with Competitive Profile Matrix Method on Market Optimization in Real Estate Company (A Case Study at Tangerang Selatan Area)

Author

Listed:
  • Yulizar Widiatama

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Management Universitas Pamulang, Indonesia,)

  • Aceng Abdul Hamid

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Management Universitas Pamulang, Indonesia,)

  • Martono Martono

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Management Universitas Pamulang, Indonesia,)

Abstract

This study aims to determine the competitiveness of real estate company as well as strategies that can be done company based on the level of importance and performance. The problem that often faced is about the competitiveness of business with other real estate companies that continue to grow. Otherwise, reduced sales turnover among the real estate companies become a serious problem for their financial status. Whereas, the company must make efforts to obtain the market share, change the sales strategy, and improve the concept of the human resource environment to achieve the target set by the company. By analyzing the real estate company's sales turnover and competitiveness with Competitive Profile Matrix and BCG Matrix method to visualize the existing condition occurred. The results of data processing of sales transactions in August 2015-July 2016 amounted to 569 units, in average, sales made by the company approximately 2 units / day. By observation from 3 Real Estate Companies in Tangerang Selatan showed that August 2015 has the lowest unit sold within the area by only 24 units sold, even though the sales were increasing by September 2015 but the trend are still degrading until July 2016. The study need the correct tools to visualize the problem and turn the result as opportunities for Real Estate Companies in Tangerang Selatan. Meanwhile the EFE Matrix value shows 2.91, IFE Matrix value shows 2.48, the value of IE Matrix shows 2.69. As for the value of Competitive Profile Matrix obtained for 2.56, from GE McKinsey matrix showed the position of real estate at high industry attractiveness quadrant with a score of 3.88 and high business strength position with a score of 3.93. There was a growth rate of 52% and a relative market share of 1.31 using the BCG Matrix. An appropriate strategy for real estate companies in Tangerang Selatan is a market penetration strategy to expanding their business directly to the consumer, product development to enhance the innovative housing product, horizontal integration (integrated horizontal) with the supplier to have economies of scale and joint venue with other business to enhance the markets of their products.

Suggested Citation

  • Yulizar Widiatama & Aceng Abdul Hamid & Martono Martono, 2018. "Business Environmental Analysis with Competitive Profile Matrix Method on Market Optimization in Real Estate Company (A Case Study at Tangerang Selatan Area)," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 8(4), pages 222-226.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2018-04-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/download/6652/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/6652/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Jie & Leung, Woon Sau & Evans, Kevin P., 2016. "Are employee-friendly workplaces conducive to innovation?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 61-79.
    2. Martin, Silvia L. & Javalgi, Rajshekhar G. & Cavusgil, Erin, 2017. "Marketing capabilities, positional advantage, and performance of born global firms: Contingent effect of ambidextrous innovation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 527-543.
    3. William Ascher & Corinne Krupp, 2010. "Rethinking Physical Infrastructure Development," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: William Ascher & Corinne Krupp (ed.), Physical Infrastructure Development: Balancing the Growth, Equity, and Environmental Imperatives, chapter 0, pages 1-33, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. André de Abreu Saraiva Monteiro Alves & Fernando Manuel Pereira de Oliveira Carvalho, 2022. "How Dynamic Managerial Capabilities, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Operational Capabilities Impact Microenterprises’ Global Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Quan Anh Nguyen & Gillian Sullivan Mort, 0. "Conceptualising organisational-level and microfoundational capabilities: an integrated view of born-globals’ internationalisation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    3. April Gunawan & Larsen Barsa & Hotman Tua, 2018. "Determinant of Lecturers Work Satisfaction and Implication on Lecturers Performance at Maritime Higher Education in DKI Jakarta," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 8(4), pages 14-23.
    4. Becker, Mary & Cardazzi, Alexander & McGurk, Zachary, 2022. "Employee satisfaction and stock returns during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    5. David B. Audretsch & Maribel Guerrero, 2023. "Is ambidexterity the missing link between entrepreneurship, management, and innovation?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 1891-1918, December.
    6. Figueiredo, Marco & Ferreira, João J. & Vrontis, Demetris, 2024. "Perspectives on dynamic capabilities and ambidexterity in born-global companies: Theoretical framing, review and research agenda," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1).
    7. Eurico Navaia & António Moreira & Cláudia Ribau, 2023. "Differentiation Strategy and Export Performance in Emerging Countries: Mediating Effects of Positional Advantage among Mozambican Firms," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Nadia Zahoor & Yong Kyu Lew, 2022. "Sustaining superior international performance: Strategic orientations and dynamic capability of environmentally concerned small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1002-1017, March.
    9. Yaoqin Li, 2021. "Religious founders and employee welfare," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(5), pages 6037-6067, December.
    10. Ângelo Miguel R. Cabral & Fernando Manuel P. O. Carvalho & José António Vasconcelos Ferreira, 2020. "International Performance of SMEs’ International Strategic Groups," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-24, September.
    11. Abdol Majid Saadat Nezhad & Tahmoures Sohrabi & Nasrollah Shadnoosh & Abbas Toloie Eshlaghy, 2017. "A New Approach to Challenges of Venture Capital in Financing the Industrial Clusters through Cooperative Models and Venture Funds in Iran," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(6), pages 111-119.
    12. Yancy Vaillant & Esteban Lafuente & Manoj Chandra Bayon, 2019. "Early internationalization patterns and export market persistence: a pseudo-panel data analysis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 669-686, October.
    13. Juchniewicz Małgorzata & Łada Magdalena, 2022. "Competitive potential vs. the competitive position of the high-tech sector in European Union countries," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 58(4), pages 371-380, December.
    14. Pham, Mia Hang & Merkoulova, Yulia & Veld, Chris, 2024. "Award-winning CEOs and corporate innovation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    15. Mora Cortez, Roberto & Johnston, Wesley J., 2018. "Needed B2B marketing capabilities: Insights from the USA and emerging Latin America," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 594-609.
    16. Pu, Xiaohong & Zeng, Ming & Zhang, Weike, 2023. "Corporate sustainable development driven by high-quality innovation: Does fiscal decentralization really matter?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 273-289.
    17. Callaghan, Christian William, 2021. "Consequences of deindustrialisation for globalisation: Insights for international business," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(3).
    18. Mika Ylinen & Mikko Ranta, 2024. "Employer ratings in social media and firm performance: Evidence from an explainable machine learning approach," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(1), pages 247-276, March.
    19. Zhang, Huili & Cui, Xuegang & Xu, Lei & Wang, Kaiyan, 2024. "Non-executive employee stock ownership plans and corporate innovation efficiency: Evidence from China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    20. Kankam-Kwarteng, Collins & Sarpong, Appiah & Amofah, Ofosu & Acheampong, Stephen, 2021. "Marketing performance of service firms: Recognizing market sensing capability and customer interaction orientation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 7, pages 8-48.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    IE Matrix; Competitive Profile Matrix ; BCG Matrix;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • R30 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location - - - General
    • R38 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2018-04-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.