IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ecm/emetrp/v56y1988i1p147-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Inverse Optimal Problem: A Dynamic Programming Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Chang, Fwu-Ranq

Abstract

This paper solves the stochastic inverse optimal problem. Dynamic programming is used to transform the origina l problem into a differential equation. A solution exists for any pro duction function with a finite slope at the origin provided the savin gs function, starting from the origin, is steep initially and flat ev entually. Three consumption functions-linear, Keynes-ian, and Cantabr igian-are also studied with a Cobb-Douglas production technology. A w ell-known result in discrete time models-that a logarithmic utility f unction and a Cobb-Douglas production function imply a Keynesian cons umption function-does not carry through to the continuous time case. Copyright 1988 by The Econometric Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang, Fwu-Ranq, 1988. "The Inverse Optimal Problem: A Dynamic Programming Approach," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 56(1), pages 147-172, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecm:emetrp:v:56:y:1988:i:1:p:147-72
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0012-9682%28198801%2956%3A1%3C147%3ATIOPAD%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Y&origin=repec
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Josa-Fombellida, Ricardo, 2008. "Markov Perfect Nash Equilibrium in stochastic differential games as solution of a generalized Euler Equations System," UC3M Working papers. Economics we086731, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    2. Posch, Olaf, 2009. "Structural estimation of jump-diffusion processes in macroeconomics," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 153(2), pages 196-210, December.
    3. Cassou, Steven P. & Lansing, Kevin J., 1998. "Optimal fiscal policy, public capital, and the productivity slowdown," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 911-935, June.
    4. Danyang Xie, 2002. "Explicit Transitional Dynamics in Growth Models," GE, Growth, Math methods 0207003, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Fiaschi, Davide & Marsili, Matteo, 2012. "Distribution of wealth and incomplete markets: Theory and empirical evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 243-267.
    6. Fwu‐Ranq Chang, 2009. "Optimal growth and impatience: A phase diagram analysis," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 5(2), pages 245-255, June.
    7. Joshi, Sumit, 1998. "A framework to analyze comparative dynamics in a continuous time stochastic growth model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 125-134, January.
    8. Antoniadou, Elena & Koulovatianos, Christos & Mirman, Leonard J., 2013. "Strategic exploitation of a common-property resource under uncertainty," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 28-39.
    9. Posch, Olaf & Trimborn, Timo, 2013. "Numerical solution of dynamic equilibrium models under Poisson uncertainty," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 2602-2622.
    10. Olaf Posch & Klaus Wälde, 2011. "On the link between volatility and growth," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 285-308, December.
    11. Ngo Long & Gerhard Sorger, 2010. "A dynamic principal-agent problem as a feedback Stackelberg differential game," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 18(4), pages 491-509, December.
    12. Posch, Olaf & Trimborn, Timo, 2010. "Numerical solution of continuous-time DSGE models under Poisson uncertainty," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-450, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    13. Kehoe, Timothy J & Levine, David K & Romer, Paul M, 1992. "On Characterizing Equilibria of Economies with Externalities and Taxes as Solutions to Optimization Problems," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 2(1), pages 43-68, January.
    14. Robert Feicht & Wolfgang Stummer, 2010. "Complete Closed-form Solution to a Stochastic Growth Model and Corresponding Speed of Economic Recovery preliminary," DEGIT Conference Papers c015_041, DEGIT, Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade.
    15. Guo Jang-Ting & Lansing Kevin J, 2003. "Globally-Stabilizing Fiscal Policy Rules," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 1-15, July.
    16. Ricardo Josa-Fombellida & Juan Rincón-Zapatero, 2015. "Euler–Lagrange equations of stochastic differential games: application to a game of a productive asset," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 59(1), pages 61-108, May.
    17. Posch, Olaf, 2011. "Explaining output volatility: The case of taxation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1589-1606.
    18. Rebelo, Sergio & Xie, Danyang, 1999. "On the optimality of interest rate smoothing," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 263-282, April.
    19. Lansing, Kevin J., 1999. "Optimal redistributive capital taxation in a neoclassical growth model," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 423-453, September.
    20. Christensen, Bent Jesper & Posch, Olaf & van der Wel, Michel, 2016. "Estimating dynamic equilibrium models using mixed frequency macro and financial data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 116-137.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:emetrp:v:56:y:1988:i:1:p:147-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.