IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-22-00104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An elementary proof of the existence of the Leontief inverse

Author

Listed:
  • Conxita Pinyol

    (Department of Economics Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona)

  • Ferran Sancho

    (Department of Economics Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona)

Abstract

We provide a new and simpler proof for the existence and non-negativity of the Leontief inverse that does not rely on advanced mathematics. Instead, we start from an economic condition related to the equilibrium in quantities between demand and supply and proceed using only elementary linear algebra to establish the nature of the inverse.

Suggested Citation

  • Conxita Pinyol & Ferran Sancho, 2022. "An elementary proof of the existence of the Leontief inverse," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 42(2), pages 662-666.
    • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-22-00104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2022/Volume42/EB-22-V42-I2-P55.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ferran Sancho, 2019. "An Armington–Leontief model," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Dietzenbacher, Erik, 2005. "Waste treatment in physical input-output analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 11-23, October.
    3. Jeong, Ki-Jun, 1982. "Direct and indirect requirements: A correct economic interpretation of the Hawkins-Simon conditions," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 349-356.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stanislav Shmelev & Harrison Roger Brook, 2021. "Macro Sustainability across Countries: Key Sector Environmentally Extended Input-Output Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-46, October.
    2. Takao Fujimoto & Yukihiko Fujita, 2008. "A Refutation Of The Commodity Exploitation Theorem," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 530-540, July.
    3. Erik Dietzenbacher & Umed Temurshoev, 2012. "Input-output impact analysis in current or constant prices: does it matter?," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 1(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Erik Dietzenbacher & Manfred Lenzen & Bart Los & Dabo Guan & Michael L. Lahr & Ferran Sancho & Sangwon Suh & Cuihong Yang, 2013. "Input--Output Analysis: The Next 25 Years," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 369-389, December.
    5. Hoekstra, Rutger & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2006. "Constructing physical input-output tables for environmental modeling and accounting: Framework and illustrations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 375-393, September.
    6. Glenn A. Aguilar-Hernandez & Carlos Pablo Sigüenza-Sanchez & Franco Donati & João F. D. Rodrigues & Arnold Tukker, 2018. "Assessing circularity interventions: a review of EEIOA-based studies," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 7(1), pages 1-24, December.
    7. Guerra, Ana-Isabel & Sancho, Ferran, 2018. "Positive and normative analysis of the output opportunity costs of GHG emissions reductions: A comparison of the six largest EU economies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 45-62.
    8. Aleix Altimiras-Martin, 2012. "Basic analytical tool-kit for input-output tables with multiple related outputs: Applications to physical input-output tables with disposals to nature," 4CMR Working Paper Series 001, University of Cambridge, Department of Land Economy, Cambridge Centre for Climate Change Mitigation Research.
    9. Dang Thi Thu Hoai & Finn Tarp & Dirk van Seventer & Ho Cong Hoa., 2016. "Growth and structural transformation in Vietnam during the 2000s," WIDER Working Paper Series 108, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. Aydoğuş, Osman & Deger, Cagacan & Tunalı Çalışkan, Elif & Gürel Günal, Gülçin, 2015. "Regional Input-Output Analysis of A Mega-Event: Possible Impact of EXPO on Izmir Economy," MPRA Paper 65547, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Takao Fujimoto & Arrigo Opocher, 2010. "Commodity Content In A General Input–Output Model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 442-453, July.
    12. J M Szyrmer, 1992. "Input—Output Coefficients and Multipliers from a Total-Flow Perspective," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(7), pages 921-937, July.
    13. Dilekli, Naci & Cazcarro, Ignacio, 2019. "Testing the SDG targets on water and sanitation using the world trade model with a waste, wastewater, and recycling framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Juan C. Surís-Regueiro & José L. Santiago, 2016. "An Input-Output methodological proposal to quantifying socio economic impacts linked to supply shocks," Working Papers 1603, Universidade de Vigo, Departamento de Economía Aplicada.
    15. Lenzen, Manfred & Murray, Joy & Sack, Fabian & Wiedmann, Thomas, 2007. "Shared producer and consumer responsibility -- Theory and practice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 27-42, February.
    16. López, Xesús Pereira & de la Torre Cuevas, Fernando, 2023. "An alternative for tracing the path between supply and use tables in current and constant prices," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 293-302.
    17. Cazcarro, I. & Hoekstra, A.Y. & Sánchez Chóliz, J., 2014. "The water footprint of tourism in Spain," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 90-101.
    18. Feng, Cuiyang & Qu, Shen & Jin, Yi & Tang, Xu & Liang, Sai & Chiu, Anthony S.F. & Xu, Ming, 2019. "Uncovering urban food-energy-water nexus based on physical input-output analysis: The case of the Detroit Metropolitan Area," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Leontief inverse; viability; linear algebra;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C6 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling
    • D5 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-22-00104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.