IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-03c20007.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some Monte Carlo results for a generalized error component model with heteroskedastic disturbances

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Phillips

    (George Washington University)

Abstract

This note provides Monte Carlo evidence illustrating that feasible and true GLS estimators of the Baltagi and Griffin (1988) generalized error component model do not have the same sampling behavior. Indeed, while the true GLS estimator is consistent, a feasible GLS estimator need not be, an observation corroborated by the Monte Carlo results.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Phillips, 2003. "Some Monte Carlo results for a generalized error component model with heteroskedastic disturbances," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 3(15), pages 1-4.
    • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-03c20007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/pubs/EB/2003/Volume3/EB-03C20007A.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert F. Phillips, 2003. "Estimation of a Stratified Error-Components Model," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 44(2), pages 501-521, May.
    2. Baltagi, Badi H & Griffin, James M, 1988. "A Generalized Error Component Model with Heteroscedastic Disturbances," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 29(4), pages 745-753, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Georges Bresson & Cheng Hsiao & Alain Pirotte, 2011. "Assessing the contribution of R&D to total factor productivity—a Bayesian approach to account for heterogeneity and heteroskedasticity," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 95(4), pages 435-452, December.
    2. Baltagi, Badi H. & Bresson, Georges & Pirotte, Alain, 2006. "Joint LM test for homoskedasticity in a one-way error component model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 401-417, October.
    3. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:3:y:2008:i:75:p:1-10 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:3:y:2003:i:15:p:1-4 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Fuhrer, Adrian & Hock, Thorsten, 2023. "Uncertainty in the Black–Litterman model: Empirical estimation of the equilibrium," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 251-275.
    6. Platoni, Silvia & Barbieri, Laura & Moro, Daniele & Sckokai, Paolo, 2020. "Heteroscedastic stratified two-way EC models of single equations and SUR systems," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 15(C), pages 46-66.
    7. M. Giulietti & S. Mccorriston & P. Osborne, 2004. "Foreign direct investment in the UK: evidence from a disaggregated panel of the UK food sector," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(7), pages 653-663.
    8. Baltagi, Badi H. & Jung, Byoung Cheol & Song, Seuck Heun, 2010. "Testing for heteroskedasticity and serial correlation in a random effects panel data model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 154(2), pages 122-124, February.
    9. Ghulam, Yaseen, 2021. "Institutions and firms’ technological changes and productivity growth," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    10. Eduardo Fé, 2012. "Instrumental variable estimation of heteroskedasticity adaptive error component models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 577-615, August.
    11. Shantanu Dutta & Om Narasimhan & Surendra Rajiv, 1999. "Success in High-Technology Markets: Is Marketing Capability Critical?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 547-568.
    12. Chen, Kevin Z. & D. Meilke, Karl & Turvey, Calum, 1999. "Income risk and farm consumption behavior," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 173-183, March.
    13. Eduardo Fé Rodríguez, 2009. "Adaptive Instrumental Variable Estimation of Heteroskedastic Error Component Models," Economics Discussion Paper Series 0921, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    14. Kouassi, Eugene & Mougoué, Mbodja & Sango, Joel & Bosson Brou, J.M. & Amba, Claude M.O. & Salisu, Afeez Adebare, 2014. "Testing for heteroskedasticity and spatial correlation in a two way random effects model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 153-171.
    15. Julius Schäper & Rainer Winkelmann, 2024. "Random effects panel data models with known heteroskedasticity," ECON - Working Papers 445, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Sep 2024.
    16. Baltagi, Badi H. & Song, Seuck Heun & Kwon, Jae Hyeok, 2009. "Testing for heteroskedasticity and spatial correlation in a random effects panel data model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 2897-2922, June.
    17. Montes-Rojas, Gabriel & Sosa-Escudero, Walter, 2011. "Robust tests for heteroskedasticity in the one-way error components model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 160(2), pages 300-310, February.
    18. Almas Heshmati & Subal C. Kumbhakar, 2010. "Technical Change and Total Factor Productivity Growth: The Case of Chinese Provinces," TEMEP Discussion Papers 201054, Seoul National University; Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP), revised Feb 2010.
    19. Subal C. Kumbhakar, 1996. "Le ralentissement de la productivité des entreprises d'électricité au Texas : le rôle des marges, des rendements d'échelle et du progrès technique," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 126(5), pages 77-89.
    20. repec:hal:journl:peer-00768191 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Nilanjana Roy, 1999. "Is Adaptive Estimation Useful for Panel Models With Heteroskedasticity in the Unit-Specific Error Component? Some Monte Carlo Evidence," Econometrics Working Papers 9913, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
    22. Shiu, Alice & Heshmati, Almas, 2006. "Technical Change and Total Factor Productivity Growth for Chinese Provinces: A Panel Data Analysis," Ratio Working Papers 98, The Ratio Institute.
    23. Nilanjana Roy, 2002. "Is Adaptive Estimation Useful For Panel Models With Heteroskedasticity In The Individual Specific Error Component? Some Monte Carlo Evidence," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 189-203.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C2 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-03c20007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.