IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eaa/eerese/v22y2022i2_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Within Economic Blocks, Countries And States Tend To Diverge (Not Converge)

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge SÁ
  • Ana Lúcia LUÍS

Abstract

There is considerable literature which indicates as one of the advantages of economic blocks the trend towards convergence among their members. The expectation is that within economic unions, there is not only a general increase in welfare, but also economic convergence, greater income similarity among its members: since it is far easier to copy than to innovate, the dissemination of innovations would create similar standards among all within an economic block. This article presents empirical evidence for the opposite: within economic blocks, be they EU countries or federal states of the USA, they tend to diverge, not converge.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge SÁ & Ana Lúcia LUÍS, 2022. "Within Economic Blocks, Countries And States Tend To Diverge (Not Converge)," Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 22(2), pages 37-44.
    • Handle: RePEc:eaa:eerese:v:22:y2022:i:2_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.usc.es/~economet/reviews/eers2222.pdf
    Download Restriction: No.
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linda Glawe & Helmut Wagner, 2021. "Divergence Tendencies in the European Integration Process: A Danger for the Sustainability of the E(M)U?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Monge-Naranjo, Alexander, 2020. "A Theory of Economic Unions: A Comment," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 128-132.
    3. Gancia, Gino & Ponzetto, Giacomo A.M. & Ventura, Jaume, 2020. "A theory of economic unions," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 107-127.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gianmarco Daniele & Amedeo Piolatto & Willem Sas, 2018. "Who Sent You? Strategic Voting, Transfers and Bailouts in a Federation," Working Papers. Serie AD 2018-05, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    2. Kirtchik, Olessia & Boldyrev, Ivan, 2024. "“Rise And Fall” Of The Walrasian Program In Economics: A Social And Intellectual Dynamics Of The General Equilibrium Theory," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(1), pages 1-26, March.
    3. Gianmarco Daniele & Amedeo Piolatto & Willem Sas, 2020. "Does the winner take it all? Redistributive policies and political extremism," Working Papers 2020/01, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    4. Gracia-Lázaro, Carlos & Dercole, Fabio & Moreno, Yamir, 2022. "Dynamics of economic unions: An agent-based model to investigate the economic and social drivers of withdrawals," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    5. Linda Glawe & Carlos Mendez, 2023. "Schooling Ain’t Learning in Europe: A Club Convergence Perspective," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 65(2), pages 324-361, June.
    6. Valentina Vučković & Ružica Šimić Banović & Martina Basarac Sertić, 2021. "Governance Trends among New EU Member States: Is There Institutional Convergence?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Eisei Ohtaki, 2023. "Optimality in an OLG model with nonsmooth preferences," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 19(3), pages 611-659, September.
    8. Kobielarz, Michał L., 2024. "A theory of international unions with exits," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    9. Rima Rubčinskaitė & Laimutė Urbšienė, 2024. "What matters for the economic synchronization of the Baltic States," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 51(3), pages 645-678, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economic blocks; European Union; USA; convergence; divergence.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O51 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - U.S.; Canada
    • O52 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Europe

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eaa:eerese:v:22:y2022:i:2_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: M. Carmen Guisan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.usc.es/economet/eaa.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.