IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v50y2024i5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the fulfillment of contraceptive method preferences affect contraceptive continuation? Evidence from urban Kenya, Nigeria, and Senegal

Author

Listed:
  • Carolina Cardona

    (Johns Hopkins University)

  • David Bishai

    (University of Hong Kong)

  • Phil Anglewicz

    (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)

Abstract

Background: Although interest in patient-centered family planning measures is growing, little is known about women’s preferences for contraceptive methods and whether these preferences influence contraceptive behaviors. Objective: We assessed whether the fulfillment of contraceptive preferences affected women’s decisions to continue, switch, or stop using contraception. Methods: Data came from a panel of urban Kenyan, Nigerian, and Senegalese women collected between 2010–2015. Women who were not using contraception at baseline and intended to use reported their preferred contraceptive method, and then at the second round reported their contraceptive use, which permits us to measure whether they fulfilled their baseline preference. We then examined whether fulfilling their contraceptive preference was associated with the decision to continue, switch, or stop using contraception by the third round by estimating a set of probit and bivariate probit models. Results: After controlling for individual, household, and health system characteristics, women with fulfilled contraceptive preferences were 25 percentage points less likely to stop or switch contraceptive methods than women with unfulfilled contraceptive preferences. Conclusions: Fulfilling contraceptive preferences is associated with later contraceptive behavior, which demonstrates the importance of these preferences for achieving family planning goals. Contribution: This study is important because it is the first research looking at the relationship between the fulfillment of contraceptive method preferences and contraceptive continuation in low- and middle-income countries. Women have a high probability of adhering to their contraceptive method when using a method that satisfies their contraceptive preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Carolina Cardona & David Bishai & Phil Anglewicz, 2024. "Does the fulfillment of contraceptive method preferences affect contraceptive continuation? Evidence from urban Kenya, Nigeria, and Senegal," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 50(5), pages 131-170.
  • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:50:y:2024:i:5
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2024.50.5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol50/5/50-5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2024.50.5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vega-Redondo, Fernando & Pin, Paolo & Ubfal, Diego & Benedetti-Fasil, Cristiana & Brummitt, Charles & Rubera, Gaia & Hovy, Dirk & Fornaciari, Tommaso, 2019. "Peer Networks and Entrepreneurship: A Pan-African RCT," IZA Discussion Papers 12848, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Christopher J. Cronin & David K. Guilkey & Ilene S. Speizer, 2018. "The effects of health facility access and quality on family planning decisions in urban Senegal," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 576-591, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christopher J. Cronin & David K. Guilkey & Ilene S. Speizer, 2019. "Measurement error in discrete health facility choice models: An example from urban Senegal," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(7), pages 1102-1120, November.
    2. Vega-Redondo, Fernando & Pin, Paolo & Ubfal, Diego & Benedetti-Fasil, Cristiana & Brummitt, Charles & Rubera, Gaia & Hovy, Dirk & Fornaciari, Tommaso, 2019. "Peer Networks and Entrepreneurship: A Pan-African RCT," IZA Discussion Papers 12848, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Finn McGuire & Noemi Kreif & Peter C. Smith, 2021. "The effect of distance on maternal institutional delivery choice: Evidence from Malawi," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(9), pages 2144-2167, September.
    4. Yacouba Kassouri, 2024. "Capital flight and public health outcomes in Africa," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 576-593, March.
    5. Aissata Mahamadou Sidibe & Paul I Kadetz & Therese Hesketh, 2020. "Factors Impacting Family Planning Use in Mali and Senegal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-15, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    family planning; preferences; contraceptive use; contraceptive discontinuation; contraceptive preferences; contraceptive dynamics; patient-centered approach;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:50:y:2024:i:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.