IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v46y2022i4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contraceptive use and fertility transitions: The distinctive experience of sub-Saharan Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Aisha Dasgupta

    (United Nations)

  • Mark Wheldon

    (United Nations Population Division)

  • Vladimíra Kantorová

    (United Nations)

  • Philipp Ueffing

    (United Nations Population Division)

Abstract

Background: Continued rapid population growth in sub-Saharan Africa is driven predominantly by high fertility. Contraceptive use was a key determinant of past fertility transitions. An analysis of this relationship in sub-Saharan Africa can yield a better understanding of the region’s prospects for fertility decline. Methods: Using global estimates and projections, we describe trends in contraceptive use and fertility and analyse the relationship between the two. Timing, pace, and level parameters derived from Bayesian hierarchical models of historic contraceptive and fertility transitions are used to investigate how the experience of sub-Saharan Africa may be distinctive. Results: Fertility in sub-Saharan Africa fell from 6.4 births per woman in 1990 to 4.6 in 2020, the highest among regions today. Contraceptive use among married/in-union women in sub-Saharan Africa increased from 13% to 33% over the same period, and remains the region with lowest use. At all levels of contraceptive use, countries of sub-Saharan Africa tend towards higher fertility compared to other regions. Transitions in contraceptive use and fertility have occurred later in sub-Saharan Africa, and have been slower in Middle and Western Africa (but not Eastern and Southern Africa), compared to the experience of Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean. Contribution: Based on an analysis using Bayesian models, we demonstrate large differences across countries in the pace and timing of fertility and contraceptive use transitions, and we confirm that Middle and Western Africa are distinct. The findings from these separate and independent models are similar, lending additional support to the validity of these conclusions.

Suggested Citation

  • Aisha Dasgupta & Mark Wheldon & Vladimíra Kantorová & Philipp Ueffing, 2022. "Contraceptive use and fertility transitions: The distinctive experience of sub-Saharan Africa," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 46(4), pages 97-130.
  • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:46:y:2022:i:4
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2022.46.4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol46/4/46-4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2022.46.4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruth Zielinski & Samia Abdelnabi & Georgina Amankwah & Vida A. Kukula & Veronica Apetorgbor & Elizabeth Awini & John Williams & Cheryl Moyer & Bidisha Ghosh & Jody R. Lori, 2024. "Knowledge, Acceptance, and Uptake of Family Planning: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Group Antenatal Care in Ghana," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(8), pages 1-10, August.
    2. Ben Malinga John, 2023. "Neglected forces of fertility variation in sub-Saharan Africa: the role of marital dissolution and repartnering," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2023-031, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    contraceptive use; fertility; family planning; sub-Saharan Africa; proximate determinants;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:46:y:2022:i:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.