IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v43y2020i23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three facets of planning and postponement of parenthood in the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Renske Verweij

    (Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)

  • Gert Stulp

    (Rijksuniversiteit Groningen)

  • Harold Snieder

    (University Medical Center Groningen)

  • Melinda Mills

    (University of Oxford)

Abstract

Background: The age at parenthood has risen by about five years in the last decades in the Netherlands. Previous studies typically focused on the age at which people have their first child, but little is known about desired timing of parenthood and how this desire changes. Objective: In this study, we examined three facets of postponement: (1) desired age to have a first child, (2) changes in this desired age, and (3) whether the desires are met. Methods: We use data from the Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social Sciences (N = 2,296), which is a representative sample of men and women in the Netherlands who have been followed for up to ten years. Results: Men and women desire to have children at relatively high ages, i.e., around age 30. About half of the respondents update these desires by increasing the desired age as they get older. Half of respondents do not become a parent at their desired time. Conclusions: The high ages at first birth observed are due to a combination of the three facets of postponement. Contribution: This study contributes to the literature by showing that the high observed age at which people have children nowadays is due to high desired ages, updating these desires upwards, and not achieving their desired timing.

Suggested Citation

  • Renske Verweij & Gert Stulp & Harold Snieder & Melinda Mills, 2020. "Three facets of planning and postponement of parenthood in the Netherlands," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(23), pages 659-672.
    • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:43:y:2020:i:23
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2020.43.23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol43/23/43-23.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2020.43.23?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lars Dommermuth & Jane E. Klobas & Trude Lappeg√Çrd, 2009. "Now or later? The theory of planned behaviour and fertility intentions," Working Papers 020, "Carlo F. Dondena" Centre for Research on Social Dynamics (DONDENA), Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi.
    2. John Bongaarts & Barbara S. Mensch & Ann K. Blanc, 2017. "Trends in the age at reproductive transitions in the developing world: The role of education," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(2), pages 139-154, May.
    3. repec:cai:poeine:pope_1102_0361 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrés F. Castro Torres, 2020. "Analysis of Latin American fertility change in terms of probable social classes," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2020-001, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    2. Nicoletta Balbo & Francesco C. Billari & Melinda Mills, 2013. "Fertility in Advanced Societies: A Review of Research," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 29(1), pages 1-38, February.
    3. Melanie Dawn Channon & Sarah Harper, 2019. "Educational differentials in the realisation of fertility intentions: Is sub-Saharan Africa different?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, July.
    4. Andrés Felipe Castro Torres, 2021. "Analysis of Latin American Fertility in Terms of Probable Social Classes," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 37(2), pages 297-339, April.
    5. Bijlsma, Maarten J. & Wilson, Ben, 2020. "Modelling the socio-economic determinants of fertility: a mediation analysis using the parametric g-formula," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102414, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Luca Maria Pesando & Nicola Barban & Maria Sironi & Frank F. Furstenberg, 2021. "A Sequence‐Analysis Approach to the Study of the Transition to Adulthood in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 47(3), pages 719-747, September.
    7. Sophia Chae & Victor Agadjanian, 2022. "The Transformation of Polygyny in Sub‐Saharan Africa," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 48(4), pages 1125-1162, December.
    8. Andrés F. Castro Torres & Ewa Batyra & Mikko Myrskylä, 2021. "Income inequality and increasing dispersion of the transition to first birth in the Global South," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2021-009, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    9. Icek Ajzen & Jane Klobas, 2013. "Fertility intentions," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 29(8), pages 203-232.
    10. Bruno D. Schoumaker & David A. Sánchez‐Páez, 2024. "Disruptions in Educational Progress and Fertility Dynamics by Educational Level: Unraveling the Link between Education and Fertility Stalls in Sub‐Saharan Africa," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 50(1), pages 59-85, March.
    11. Daphne H. Liu & Adrian E. Raftery, 2020. "How Do Education and Family Planning Accelerate Fertility Decline?," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 46(3), pages 409-441, September.
    12. Olivia Nankinga & Betty Kwagala & Eddy J Walakira, 2019. "Maternal employment and child nutritional status in Uganda," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Valentina Tocchioni & Marcantonio Caltabiano & Silvia Meggiolaro, 2022. "Diverse pathways in young Italians’ entrance into sexual life: The association with gender and birth cohort," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 46(13), pages 355-396.
    14. Hieu T. M. Nguyen & Blane D. Lewis, 2020. "Teenage Marriage and Motherhood in Vietnam: The Negative Effects of Starting School Early," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 39(4), pages 739-762, August.
    15. Jesse Naidoo, 2021. "Human Capital and the Timing of the First Birth," Working Papers 11011, South African Reserve Bank.
    16. Emily Treleaven & Emma Banchoff, 2024. "Children under 5 in polygynous households in sub-Saharan Africa, 2000 to 2020," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 51(32), pages 999-1016.
    17. Benedict Ogbemudia Imhanrenialena & Wilson Ebhotemhen & Anthony Aziegbemin Ekeoba & Andrew Asan Ate, 2023. "Exploring how unemployment and grandparental support influence reproductive decisions in sub-Saharan African countries: Nigeria in focus," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Tariku Dejene & Eshetu Gurmu, 2024. "Correlates of timing and intensity of reproductive transition among Ethiopian youths: A multistate multilevel analysis," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Margaret Frye & Sara Lopus, 2018. "From Privilege to Prevalence: Contextual Effects of Women’s Schooling on African Marital Timing," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 55(6), pages 2371-2394, December.
    20. Aart C. Liefbroer, 2011. "On the usefulness of the Theory of Planned Behaviour for fertility research," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 9(1), pages 55-62.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    fertility; postponement; Netherlands; age at first birth; fertility desires;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:43:y:2020:i:23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.