IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ddj/fseeai/y2022i1p102-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Causal Recipes Assessing the Quality Level of Incubation Programs – A Comparative Approach Italy – Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandru CAPATINA

    (Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Romania)

  • Adrian MICU

    (Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Romania)

  • Giuseppe EMPOLI

    (University of Foggia, Italy)

Abstract

Configurational comparative methods integrate qualitative and quantitative approaches, being particularly useful to provide a better understanding of entrepreneurial ecosystems from different countries. Business incubators should not be treated as independent entities, but rather integrated into the entrepreneurial ecosystem, in order to promote innovation, competitiveness, technology transfer and other key public policy objectives to support entrepreneurship. The objective of the qualitative-comparative study carried out in this article is to determine the causal recipes that influence the quality level of incubation programs in incubators in Italy and Romania. Findings from this empirical research outline how the antecedent conditions (degree of incubator involvement in the initiation stage; degree of involvement of the incubator in the start-up stage; degree of incubator involvement in the execution stage; degree of incubator involvement in the commercial development stage; financial support for incubated start-ups; business accelerator services available) lead to a high-quality level of incubation programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandru CAPATINA & Adrian MICU & Giuseppe EMPOLI, 2022. "Causal Recipes Assessing the Quality Level of Incubation Programs – A Comparative Approach Italy – Romania," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 102-110.
    • Handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2022:i:1:p:102-110
    DOI: 10.35219/eai15840409252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eia.feaa.ugal.ro/images/eia/2022_1/Capatina_Micu_Empoli.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.35219/eai15840409252?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pappas, Ilias O. & Woodside, Arch G., 2021. "Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    2. Rudy Aernoudt, 2004. "Incubators: Tool for Entrepreneurship?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 127-135, September.
    3. Maximilian von Zedtwitz, 2003. "Classification and management of incubators: aligning strategic objectives and competitive scope for new business facilitation," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1/2), pages 176-196.
    4. Sophia Gerlach & Alexander Brem, 2015. "What determines a successful business incubator? Introduction to an incubator guide," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(3), pages 286-307.
    5. Albort-Morant, Gema & Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo, 2016. "A bibliometric analysis of international impact of business incubators," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1775-1779.
    6. Colombo, Massimo G. & Delmastro, Marco, 2002. "How effective are technology incubators?: Evidence from Italy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(7), pages 1103-1122, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. Piet Hausberg & Sabrina Korreck, 2020. "Business incubators and accelerators: a co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 151-176, February.
    2. Brian J. Bergman & Jeffery S. McMullen, 2022. "Helping Entrepreneurs Help Themselves: A Review and Relational Research Agenda on Entrepreneurial Support Organizations," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 688-728, May.
    3. Kameliya Deyanova & Nataliia Brehmer & Artur Lapidus & Victor Tiberius & Steve Walsh, 2022. "Hatching start-ups for sustainable growth: a bibliometric review on business incubators," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(7), pages 2083-2109, October.
    4. Gozem Guceri-Ucar & Stefan Koch, 2016. "Exploring business incubation practices and relationships to drivers of start-up success in Turkey," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(1/2), pages 1-19.
    5. Sohail, Kanza & Belitski, Maksim & Castro Christiansen, Liza, 2023. "Developing business incubation process frameworks: A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    6. Concy Liberata Noronha & Subhash Kizhakan Veatil Bhaskaran Pillai, 2025. "Fostering startups through the vehicle of entrepreneurial support organisations like technology business incubators (TBIs): a systematic literature review," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 15(1), pages 1-39, December.
    7. Silvia Sedita & Roberto Grandinetti, 2014. "Relationships at work in a networked business incubator: the case of H-Farm," "Marco Fanno" Working Papers 0190, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche "Marco Fanno".
    8. Sansone, Giuliano & Andreotti, Pietro & Colombelli, Alessandra & Landoni, Paolo, 2020. "Are social incubators different from other incubators? Evidence from Italy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    9. Tali Hadasa Blank, 2021. "When incubator resources are crucial: survival chances of student startups operating in an academic incubator," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 1845-1868, December.
    10. Ernesto Tavoletti, 2013. "Business Incubators: Effective Infrastructures or Waste of Public Money? Looking for a Theoretical Framework, Guidelines and Criteria," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 4(4), pages 423-443, December.
    11. Li Xiao & David North, 2017. "The graduation performance of technology business incubators in China’s three tier cities: the role of incubator funding, technical support, and entrepreneurial mentoring," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 615-634, June.
    12. Sai Lan & Xiang Gao & Qing Wang & Yilin Zhang, 2018. "Public Policy Environment and Entrepreneurial Activities: Evidence from China," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 26(3), pages 88-108, May.
    13. Mian, Sarfraz & Lamine, Wadid & Fayolle, Alain, 2016. "Technology Business Incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 50, pages 1-12.
    14. Inès Gabarret & Annabelle Jaouen & Walid A. Nakara & Benjamin Vedel, 2014. "Why are small public incubators "lagging behind"? Learning from disability in the selection practices of a French incubator," Post-Print hal-01886228, HAL.
    15. Pierrick Bouffaron & Benoit Weil & Pascal Le Masson & Cédric Denis-Rémis, 2019. "Re-inventing corporate innovation through incubation. The VINCI Leonard case study," Post-Print hal-02321451, HAL.
    16. Annalisa Croce & Luca Grilli & Samuele Murtinu, 2014. "Venture capital enters academia: an analysis of university-managed funds," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 39(5), pages 688-715, October.
    17. Frank J. Van Rijnsoever & Marijn A. Van Weele & Chris P. Eveleens, 2017. "Network brokers or hit makers? Analyzing the influence of incubation on start-up investments," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 605-629, June.
    18. Schwartz, Michael, 2010. "A Control Group Study of Incubators’ Impact to Promote Firm Survival," IWH Discussion Papers 11/2010, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    19. Bibeau, Jean & Meilleur, Roxane & St-Jean, Étienne, 2024. "To formalize, or not to formalize, business incubators’ networks: That is not the question," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    20. Riddle, Liesl & Hrivnak, George A. & Nielsen, Tjai M., 2010. "Transnational diaspora entrepreneurship in emerging markets: Bridging institutional divides," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 398-411, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2022:i:1:p:102-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gianina Mihai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fegalro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.