IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ddj/ejards/y2024i2p48-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preliminary Study about Comparison of Potato Minitubers Production in Conventional Culture and Modern Culture – Aeroponic

Author

Listed:
  • Andreea Tican

    (National Institute of Research and Development for Potato and Sugar Beet Brasov, Romania)

  • Carmen Chelmea

    (National Institute of Research and Development for Potato and Sugar Beet Brasov, Romania)

  • Mihaela Cioloca

    (National Institute of Research and Development for Potato and Sugar Beet Brasov, Romania)

  • Monica Popa

    (National Institute of Research and Development for Potato and Sugar Beet Brasov, Romania)

  • Maria Stefan

    (National Institute of Research and Development for Potato and Sugar Beet Brasov, Romania)

Abstract

In 2024, within the Research Laboratory for Plant Tissue Cultures, of the National Institute of Research and Development for Potato and Sugar Beet Brașov, the minituberization process was evaluated for four potato varieties (Azaria, Brașovia, Cosiana and Cezarina) by applying two cultivation methods: aeroponic culture (wihout substrate) and classical culture (with a peat-perlite mixture as the cultivation substrate). The varieties studied behaved differently in minituberization, depending on the culture applied. The average number of minitubers (in the two cultivation methods) was between 16.50 (Azaria variety) and 5.17 (Cosiana variety). The statistical analysis (performed to establish the influence of the type of culture) shows the superiority in minituberization process of taeroponic culture (12 minitubers), compared to the classical culture on peat-perlite substrate (6.94).

Suggested Citation

  • Andreea Tican & Carmen Chelmea & Mihaela Cioloca & Monica Popa & Maria Stefan, 2024. "Preliminary Study about Comparison of Potato Minitubers Production in Conventional Culture and Modern Culture – Aeroponic," Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development Studies, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Doctoral Field Engineering and Management in Agriculture and Rural Development, issue 2, pages 48-54.
    • Handle: RePEc:ddj:ejards:y:2024:i:2:p:48-54
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.35219/jards.2024.2.05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jards.ugal.ro/images/jards/journal/2024_2/Tican_Chelmea_Cioloca_Popa_Stefan2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.35219/jards.2024.2.05?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K. Rykaczewska, 2016. "The potato minituber production from microtubers in aeroponic culture," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(5), pages 210-214.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Milan Čížek & Zuzana Komárková, 2022. "Comparison of aeroponics and conventional system of production of potato mini-tubers in the conditions of the Czech Republic," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(8), pages 366-374.
    2. K. Rykaczewska, 2016. "Field performance of potato minitubers produced in aeroponic culture," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(11), pages 522-526.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:ejards:y:2024:i:2:p:48-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gianina Mihai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fegalro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.