IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/das/njaigs/v6y2024i1p625-635id289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Explainable AI in Bias Mitigation for Hyper-personalization

Author

Listed:
  • Raghu K Para

Abstract

Hyper-personalization involves leveraging advanced data analytics and machine learning models to deliver highly personalized recommendations and consumer experiences. While these methods provide substantial user experience benefits, they raise ethical and technical concerns, notably the risk of propagating or escalating biases. As personalization algorithms become increasingly intricate and complex, biases may inadvertently shape the hyper-personalized content consumers receive, potentially reinforcing stereotypes, thereby limiting exposure to diverse information, and entrenching social inequalities. Explainable AI (XAI) has emerged as a critical approach to enhance transparency, trust, and accountability in complex data models. By making the inner workings and decision-making processes of machine learning models more interpretable, XAI enables stakeholders—starting from developers to policy regulators and end-users—to detect and mitigate biases. This paper provides a comprehensive literature-driven exploration of how XAI methods can assist in bias identification, audits, and mitigation in hyper-personalized systems. We examine state-of-the-art explainability techniques, discuss their applicability, strengths and limitations, and highlight related fairness frameworks, and propose a conceptual roadmap for integrating XAI into hyper-personalized pipelines. We conclude with a discussion on future research directions and the need for interdisciplinary efforts to ensure crafting ethical and inclusive hyper-personalization strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Raghu K Para, 2024. "The Role of Explainable AI in Bias Mitigation for Hyper-personalization," Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN:3006-4023, Open Knowledge, vol. 6(1), pages 625-635.
  • Handle: RePEc:das:njaigs:v:6:y:2024:i:1:p:625-635:id:289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://newjaigs.com/index.php/JAIGS/article/view/289
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Veale, Michael & Binns, Reuben, 2017. "Fairer machine learning in the real world: Mitigating discrimination without collecting sensitive data," SocArXiv ustxg, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sandeep Pochu & Sai Rama Krishna Nersu & Srikanth Reddy Kathram, 2024. "Zero Trust Principles in Cloud Security: A DevOps Perspective," Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN:3006-4023, Open Knowledge, vol. 6(1), pages 660-671.
    2. Sandeep Pochu & Sai Rama Krishna Nersu & Srikanth Reddy Kathram, 2024. "Enhancing Cloud Security with Automated Service Mesh Implementations in DevOps Pipelines," Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN:3006-4023, Open Knowledge, vol. 7(01), pages 90-103.
    3. Sandeep Pochu & Sai Rama Krishna Nersu & Srikanth Reddy Kathram, 2024. "Multi-Cloud DevOps Strategies: A Framework for Agility and Cost Optimization," Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN:3006-4023, Open Knowledge, vol. 7(01), pages 104-119.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alina Köchling & Marius Claus Wehner, 2020. "Discriminated by an algorithm: a systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 795-848, November.
    2. Veale, Michael & Binns, Reuben & Van Kleek, Max, 2018. "Some HCI Priorities for GDPR-Compliant Machine Learning," LawArXiv wm6yk, Center for Open Science.
    3. Brielle Lillywhite & Gregor Wolbring, 2022. "Emergency and Disaster Management, Preparedness, and Planning (EDMPP) and the ‘Social’: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-50, October.
    4. Arifuzzaman (Arif) Sheikh & Steven J. Simske & Edwin K. P. Chong, 2024. "Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Models for Resource Allocation in Circular Economy Digital Marketplace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-39, December.
    5. Veale, Michael & Van Kleek, Max & Binns, Reuben, 2018. "Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Making," SocArXiv 8kvf4_v1, Center for Open Science.
    6. Veale, Michael & Van Kleek, Max & Binns, Reuben, 2018. "Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Making," SocArXiv 8kvf4, Center for Open Science.
    7. Kira J.M. Matus & Michael Veale, 2022. "Certification systems for machine learning: Lessons from sustainability," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 177-196, January.
    8. Simerta Gill & Gregor Wolbring, 2022. "Auditing the ‘Social’ Using Conventions, Declarations, and Goal Setting Documents: A Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-100, October.
    9. Matus, Kira & Veale, Michael, 2021. "Certification Systems for Machine Learning: Lessons from Sustainability," SocArXiv pm3wy, Center for Open Science.
    10. Alexandru Constantin Ciobanu & Gabriela Meè˜Nièšä‚, 2021. "Ai Ethics In Business €“ A Bibliometric Approach," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 28, pages 169-202, December.
    11. Moritz Zahn & Stefan Feuerriegel & Niklas Kuehl, 2022. "The Cost of Fairness in AI: Evidence from E-Commerce," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(3), pages 335-348, June.
    12. Veale, Michael & Brass, Irina, 2019. "Administration by Algorithm? Public Management meets Public Sector Machine Learning," SocArXiv mwhnb, Center for Open Science.
    13. Irene Unceta & Jordi Nin & Oriol Pujol, 2020. "Risk mitigation in algorithmic accountability: The role of machine learning copies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:das:njaigs:v:6:y:2024:i:1:p:625-635:id:289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Open Knowledge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://newjaigs.com/index.php/JAIGS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.