IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/wotrrv/v1y2002i02p187-209_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional versus multilateral liberalization of services

Author

Listed:
  • STEPHENSON, SHERRY M.

Abstract

Many WTO members have been engaging in efforts at the regional level to liberalize services trade even as they are negotiating under the GATS. This duplication of negotiating effort might appear misplaced, unless regional trade agreements can actually produce results going beyond those at the multilateral level and thus serve the interests of their members. This paper explores in what areas regional agreements on services have surpassed the GATS in terms of delivering on three key objectives set out by all service agreements, namely the promotion of transparency, stability, and liberalization for services trade. The paper comments on how countries may evaluate where to best direct their negotiating efforts, according to the type of service activity in question, and suggests that regional agreements can prove to be useful in supporting and pushing forward multilateral services liberalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephenson, Sherry M., 2002. "Regional versus multilateral liberalization of services," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(2), pages 187-209, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:wotrrv:v:1:y:2002:i:02:p:187-209_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474745602001155/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dee, Philippa, 2014. "Does AFAS have bite? Comparing services trade commitments with actual practice," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 46-64.
    2. Innwon Park & Soonchan Park, 2011. "Regional Liberalisation of Trade in Services," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34, pages 725-740, May.
    3. Roy, Martin & Marchetti, Juan & Lim, Hoe, 2006. "Services liberalization in the new generation of Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs): How much further than the GATS?," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2006-07, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    4. Baccini, Leonardo & Dür, Andreas & Elsig, Manfred & Milewicz, Karolina, 2011. "The design of preferential trade agreements: A new dataset in the Making," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2011-10, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    5. Jansen, Marion, 2006. "Services trade liberalization at the regional level: Does Southern and Eastern Africa stand to gain from EPA negotiations?," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2006-06, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    6. World Bank, 2005. "Enhancing the Prospects of Growth and Trade of the Kyrgyz Republic," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 13533.
    7. International Monetary Fund, 2005. "Eastern Caribbean Currency Union: Selected Issues," IMF Staff Country Reports 2005/305, International Monetary Fund.
    8. World Bank, 2005. "Kyrgyz Republic : Country Economic Memorandum - Enhancing the Prospects for Growth and Trade, Volume 1, Main Report," World Bank Publications - Reports 8508, The World Bank Group.
    9. World Bank, 2007. "East Asian FTAs in Services," World Bank Publications - Reports 19240, The World Bank Group.
    10. Mao, Rui & Liu, Yuhang & Wang, Xiaoxi, 2023. "Economic and environmental impacts of agricultural non-tariff measures: evidence based on ad valorem equivalent estimates," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 26(3), January.
    11. Jansen, Marion & Vennes, Yannick, 2006. "Liberalizing financial services trade in Africa: Going regional and multilateral," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2006-03, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:wotrrv:v:1:y:2002:i:02:p:187-209_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/wtr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.