IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/polals/v26y2018i03p338-344_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Historical Disparities and Gendered Citation Patterns

Author

Listed:
  • Peterson, David A. M.

Abstract

In this comment on Dion, Sumner, and Mitchell’s article “Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields,” I explore the role of changes in the disparities of citations to work written by women over time. Breaking down their citation data by era, I find that some of the patterns in citations are the result of the legacy of disparity in the field. Citations to more recent work come closer to matching the distribution of the gender of authors of published work. Although the need for more equitable practices of citation remains, the overall patterns are not quite as bad as Dion, Sumner, and Mitchell conclude.

Suggested Citation

  • Peterson, David A. M., 2018. "Historical Disparities and Gendered Citation Patterns," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(3), pages 338-344, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:26:y:2018:i:03:p:338-344_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1047198718000165/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mahembe, Edmore & Odhiambo, Nicholas M, 2019. "The effectiveness of foreign aid: Graduation from official development assistance," Working Papers 25172, University of South Africa, Department of Economics.
    2. Mahembe, Edmore & Odhiambo, Nicholas M, 2019. "The Effectiveness of Foreign Aid in Developing Countries: An Exploratory Review," Working Papers 25342, University of South Africa, Department of Economics.
    3. Wang, Wei & Cai, Kaiquan & Du, Wenbo & Wu, Xin & Tong, Lu (Carol) & Zhu, Xi & Cao, Xianbin, 2020. "Analysis of the Chinese railway system as a complex network," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:26:y:2018:i:03:p:338-344_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.