IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/maorev/v7y2011i01p97-124_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Where Do Social Ties Come From: Institutional Framework and Governmental Tie Distribution among Chinese Managers

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Stan Xiao
  • Yao, Xiaotao
  • Sue-Chan, Christina
  • Xi, Youmin

Abstract

This study identifies the societal institutional framework as the cause for the tie distribution issue — the sizes of ego-networks of social actors are unevenly distributed across social categories of these social actors. The analysis of 250 Chinese firms showed that managers employed by state-owned enterprises possess more governmental tie channels – conduits to get acquainted with government officials – than those employed by non-state-owned enterprises. Governmental tie channels completely mediated the relationship between ownership types and the number of government ties in the manager's social network.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Stan Xiao & Yao, Xiaotao & Sue-Chan, Christina & Xi, Youmin, 2011. "Where Do Social Ties Come From: Institutional Framework and Governmental Tie Distribution among Chinese Managers," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 97-124, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:7:y:2011:i:01:p:97-124_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1740877600002321/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Renfei Gao & Helen Wei Hu & Toru Yoshikawa, 2024. "Attraction versus competition: A tale of two similarity effects in director selection of Chinese firms," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 275-316, March.
    2. Lin Zhang & Yuehua Xu & Honghui Chen, 2022. "Do Returnee Executives Value Corporate Philanthropy? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 411-430, August.
    3. Hongjuan Zhang & Rong Han & Liang Wang & Runhui Lin, 2021. "Social capital in China: a systematic literature review," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(1), pages 32-77, February.
    4. Fei Song & C. Bram Cadsby & Yunyun Bi, 2012. "Trust, Reciprocity, and Guanxi in China: An Experimental Investigation," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 8(2), pages 397-421, July.
    5. Hongjuan Zhang & Rong Han & Liang Wang & Runhui Lin, 0. "Social capital in China: a systematic literature review," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-46.
    6. Xiu, Zongfeng & Liu, Ran & Yin, Jingwei, 2022. "Confucian merchants culture, social movement and entrepreneurs’ political participation: evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 795-821.
    7. Xueling Li & Jia Shen & Wenjie Ma & Weiyong Zhang, 2016. "The effect of business ties and government ties on new IT venture growth: an empirical examination in China," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 245-261, September.
    8. Wang, Chengqi & Piperopoulos, Panagiotis & Chen, Shihua & Ming, Alan Au Kai & Herbert, Kendall, 2022. "Outward FDI and Innovation Performance of Chinese Firms: Why Can Home-Grown Political Ties Be A Liability?," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(3).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:7:y:2011:i:01:p:97-124_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.