IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/maorev/v5y2009i01p121-129_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Never the Twain Shall Meet? Integrating Chinese and Western Management Research

Author

Listed:
  • Leung, Kwok

Abstract

This commentary offers several directions for the development of Chinese management research based on the penetrating analyses provided by Barney and Zhang (2009) and Whetten (2009). First and foremost, Chinese management researchers can develop novel, seminal ideas and theories that are not necessarily tied to the Chinese cultural context but are applicable in diverse cultural contexts. The success of this approach depends on the merit of the ideas and theories proposed. A fusion, or combined emic–etic approach, can also be attempted, which integrates elements from Western and indigenous theories. Finally, the synergistic approach involves a dynamic interplay of Chinese and Western management research, which will eventually lead to innovative, culture-general theories. This article argues that all three approaches should be emphasized in Chinese management research.

Suggested Citation

  • Leung, Kwok, 2009. "Never the Twain Shall Meet? Integrating Chinese and Western Management Research," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 121-129, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:5:y:2009:i:01:p:121-129_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S174087760000067X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nida ul Habib Bajwa & Cornelius J. König, 2019. "How much is research in the top journals of industrial/organizational psychology dominated by authors from the U.S.?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(3), pages 1147-1161, September.
    2. repec:bfv:journl:039 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Garry D. Bruton & Shaker A. Zahra & Li Cai, 2018. "Examining Entrepreneurship Through Indigenous Lenses," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(3), pages 351-361, May.
    4. Eranova, Mariya & Prashantham, Shameen, 2016. "Decision making and paradox: Why study China?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 193-201.
    5. Rachida Aïssaoui & J. Michael Geringer & Grigorios Livanis, 2020. "International Collaboration and European Contributions to International Business Research," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 60(6), pages 827-868, December.
    6. Rosalie L. Tung, 2023. "To make JIBS matter for a better world," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(1), pages 1-10, February.
    7. Nida ul Habib Bajwa & Markus Langer & Cornelius J. König & Hannah Honecker, 2019. "What might get published in management and applied psychology? Experimentally manipulating implicit expectations of reviewers regarding hedges," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(3), pages 1351-1371, September.
    8. Chimenson, Dina & Tung, Rosalie L. & Panibratov, Andrei & Fang, Tony, 2022. "The paradox and change of Russian cultural values," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(3).
    9. Galina Shirokova & Tatiana Beliaeva & Tatiana S. Manolova, 2023. "The Role of Context for Theory Development: Evidence From Entrepreneurship Research on Russia," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(6), pages 2384-2418, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:5:y:2009:i:01:p:121-129_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.