IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/maorev/v12y2016i04p649-658_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Critique of Empirical Social Science: New Policies at Management and Organization Review

Author

Listed:
  • Lewin, Arie Y.
  • Chiu, Chi-Yue
  • Fey, Carl F.
  • Levine, Sheen S.
  • McDermott, Gerald
  • Murmann, Johan Peter
  • Tsang, Eric

Abstract

At the June 2016 meeting of the International Association for Chinese Management Research, MOR organized a symposium to discuss the mounting criticisms of empirical social science and subsequent changes, as part of ongoing discussions affecting journal reviewing policies. This article overviews the history of modern empirical social science as the foundation of management, organization, and strategy research and the criticism of social science research, which has reached the point that some critics refer to current publication norms as encouraging and enabling the publication of junk science. Most importantly, however, this article outlines MOR's strategy going forward and the new reviewing initiatives that MOR is implementing as of Volume 13 (2017).

Suggested Citation

  • Lewin, Arie Y. & Chiu, Chi-Yue & Fey, Carl F. & Levine, Sheen S. & McDermott, Gerald & Murmann, Johan Peter & Tsang, Eric, 2016. "The Critique of Empirical Social Science: New Policies at Management and Organization Review," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(4), pages 649-658, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:12:y:2016:i:04:p:649-658_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1740877616000437/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Klaus E Meyer & Arjen Witteloostuijn & Sjoerd Beugelsdijk, 2017. "What’s in a p? Reassessing best practices for conducting and reporting hypothesis-testing research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(5), pages 535-551, July.
    2. Xiaoming He & Lin Cui & Klaus E. Meyer, 2022. "How state and market logics influence firm strategy from within and outside? Evidence from Chinese financial intermediary firms," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 587-614, June.
    3. Liu, Yipeng & Collinson, Simon & Cooper, Sir Cary & Baglieri, Daniela, 2022. "International business, innovation and ambidexterity: A micro-foundational perspective," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(3).
    4. Markku Maula & Wouter Stam, 2020. "Enhancing Rigor in Quantitative Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(6), pages 1059-1090, November.
    5. Bauer, Florian & Schriber, Svante & Degischer, Daniel & King, David R., 2018. "Contextualizing speed and cross-border acquisition performance: Labor market flexibility and efficiency effects," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 290-301.
    6. Jesús de Frutos-Belizón & Fernando Martín-Alcázar & Gonzalo Sánchez-Gardey, 2021. "The research–practice gap in the field of HRM: a qualitative study from the academic side of the gap," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1465-1515, August.
    7. Tsui, Anne S., 2021. "Usefulness, Credibility and Scientific Norms: Reflections on Our Third Responsibility," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 75(2), pages 175-187.
    8. Sheen S. Levine & Mark Bernard & Rosemarie Nagel, 2018. "Strategic intelligence: The cognitive capability to anticipate competitor behaviour," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 527-527, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:12:y:2016:i:04:p:649-658_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.