IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/macdyn/v16y2012is1p103-116_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does The Capital Intensity Matter? Evidence From The Postwar Japanese Economy And Other Oecd Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Takahashi, Harutaka
  • Mashiyama, Koichi
  • Sakagami, Tomoya

Abstract

The capital intensity takes an important role in two-sector and multisector growth models. Surprisingly very few empirical studies have been conducted so far except by Kuga (1967). This fact implies that few people have ever tried to perform any empirical research to study whether the two-sector and multisector optimal growth models could explain the economic development properly based on the empirical data. Although we witnessed fairly active theoretical research on two-sector and multisector growth models in the 1990s and recent years, R. M. Solow has thrown doubt on the capital intensities [in Philippe Aghion and Steven Durlauf (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. 1A (2005, pp. 3–10)]. Our purpose is to measure the capital intensities of the consumption good and the investment good sectors mainly in the postwar Japanese economy, and also in other OECD countries. By so doing, we will demonstrate that the capital intensity does matter and our empirical evidence will strongly support the common assumption that the consumption goods sector is more capital-intensive than the capital goods sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Takahashi, Harutaka & Mashiyama, Koichi & Sakagami, Tomoya, 2012. "Does The Capital Intensity Matter? Evidence From The Postwar Japanese Economy And Other Oecd Countries," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(S1), pages 103-116, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:macdyn:v:16:y:2012:i:s1:p:103-116_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1365100511000514/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antoine Le Riche, 2016. "Macroeconomic Volatility and Trade in OLG Economies," Working Papers halshs-01079773, HAL.
    2. Takuma Kunieda & Kazuo Nishimura, 2023. "Capital Account Liberalization, Financial Frictions, and Belief-Driven Fluctuations," Discussion Paper Series 244, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University.
    3. Antoine Le Riche, 2017. "Macroeconomic volatility and trade in OLG economies," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 13(4), pages 401-425, December.
    4. Daria ONORI & Francesco MAGRIS & Antoine LE RICHE, 2017. "Monetary Rules in a Two-Sector Endogenous Growth Model with Cash-in-Advance Constraint," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 2504, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    5. Takahashi, Harutaka & Le Riche, Antoine, 2021. "A dynamic theory of the declining aggregated labor income share: Intangible capital vs. tangible capital," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 104-118.
    6. Marion Davin & Karine Gente & Carine Nourry, 2013. "Should a Country Invest more in Human or Physical Capital? A Two-Sector Endogenous Growth Approach," Working Papers halshs-00822391, HAL.
    7. Abad, Nicolas & Venditti, Alain, 2021. "A Note On Balanced-Budget Income Taxes And Aggregate (In)Stability In Multi-Sector Economies," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(3), pages 824-843, April.
    8. Antoine Riche & Francesco Magris & Daria Onori, 2020. "Monetary rules in a two-sector endogenous growth model," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 69(4), pages 1049-1100, June.
    9. Shogo Ogawa, 2022. "Neoclassical stability and Keynesian instability: A two‐sector disequilibrium approach," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 481-513, May.
    10. Kazuo Nishimura & Carine Nourry & Thomas Seegmuller & Alain Venditti, 2013. "Destabilizing balanced-budget consumption taxes in multi-sector economies," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 9(1), pages 113-130, March.
    11. Martina Novotná & Ivana Faltová Leitmanová & Jiří Alina & Tomáš Volek, 2020. "Capital Intensity and Labour Productivity in Waste Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Kazuo Nishimura & Alain Venditti & Makoto Yano, 2014. "Destabilization effect of international trade in a perfect foresight dynamic general equilibrium model," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 55(2), pages 357-392, February.
    13. Antoine Le Riche, 2014. "Macroeconomic Volatility and Trade in OLG Economies," AMSE Working Papers 1446, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France, revised Nov 2014.
    14. Ricardo Azevedo Araujo & Carlos Eduardo Drumond, 2021. "A two‐sector neo‐Kaleckian model of growth and distribution: Investment allocation and evolutionary dynamics," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(1), pages 213-236, February.
    15. Harutaka Takahashi, 2021. "Toward a Theory of the Labor Share’s Fall: A Dynamic Model of the 'Superstar’ Firm," Discussion Papers 2127, Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University.
    16. Antoine Le Riche & Carine Nourry & Alain Venditti, 2012. "Efficient Endogenous Fluctuations in Two-Sector OLG Model," Working Papers halshs-00793704, HAL.
    17. Ogawa, Shogo, 2019. "Effective Demand and Quantity Constrained Growth: A Simple Two-Sector Disequilibrium Approach," MPRA Paper 93336, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Kojun Hamada & Akihiko Kaneko & Mitsuyoshi Yanagihara, 2022. "Fertility decline and a pay‐as‐you‐go pension system in a two‐sector model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 466-480, May.
    19. Hu, Yunfang & Mino, Kazuo, 2013. "Trade structure and belief-driven fluctuations in a global economy," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 414-424.
    20. Davin, Marion & Gente, Karine & Nourry, Carine, 2015. "Should a country invest more in human or physical capital?," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 44-52.
    21. Judzik, Dario & Sala, Hector, 2015. "The determinants of capital intensity in Japan and the US," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 78-98.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:macdyn:v:16:y:2012:i:s1:p:103-116_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mdy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.