IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v30y2024i6p2223-2254_31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dismantling pervasive gender stereotypes in healthcare leadership contexts with an ecological systems theory approach

Author

Listed:
  • Lux, Andrei A.
  • Salehi, Nasim
  • Hurley, Diarmuid
  • Emanuel, Elizabeth

Abstract

Leadership emergence is fraught with pervasive gender stereotypes, and women remain underrepresented in senior leadership roles, particularly in healthcare organisations. We apply ecological systems theory to explain how environmental factors enable or inhibit women’s leadership emergence in healthcare settings. We interviewed 17 senior female leaders in the Australian healthcare sector to explore how gender-related perceptions affected their leadership journeys. Five themes emerged that challenge existing narratives: men supported women’s advancement; women impeded other women’s progress; vulnerability was a leadership strength; ambitious women were ostracised; and women were ‘given’ leadership opportunities rather than actively pursuing them. By situating these findings within the ecological systems theory framework, we highlight the interplay of individual and contextual influences across ecosystem levels. Our study offers a novel perspective on gender stereotypes in leadership emergence, advancing ecological systems theory by extending it into a new field. We provide recommendations at individual, organisational, community, and societal levels to empower women leaders.

Suggested Citation

  • Lux, Andrei A. & Salehi, Nasim & Hurley, Diarmuid & Emanuel, Elizabeth, 2024. "Dismantling pervasive gender stereotypes in healthcare leadership contexts with an ecological systems theory approach," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(6), pages 2223-2254, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:6:p:2223-2254_31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367224000798/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:6:p:2223-2254_31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.