IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v30y2024i6p1790-1808_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Well, actually’: investigating mansplaining in the modern workplace

Author

Listed:
  • Smith, Chelsie J.
  • Schweitzer, Linda
  • Lauch, Katarina
  • Bird, Ashlyn

Abstract

This mixed-method investigation examines the nature, prevalence, and correlates of mansplaining in modern workplaces. In Study 1, we scrape Twitter and conduct a thematic analysis of 2,312 tweets. These findings ground a comprehensive definition of mansplaining and propose six items for measurement. In Study 2, we quantitatively investigate mansplaining experiences at work (n = 499), finding that almost every participant had experienced mansplaining in the previous year. Expected gender differences emerged among mansplaining perpetrators and targets, yet men were not the only perpetrators, nor were women the only targets. Confirmatory factor analysis results support the possibility that mansplaining is a second factor of incivility. Further, mansplaining predicted significant variance in outcomes such as job satisfaction and turnover intentions above and beyond incivility. This research underscores that mansplaining is more than a social media phenomenon. Rather, it is a form of gendered mistreatment with implications for scholars and practitioners alike.

Suggested Citation

  • Smith, Chelsie J. & Schweitzer, Linda & Lauch, Katarina & Bird, Ashlyn, 2024. "‘Well, actually’: investigating mansplaining in the modern workplace," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(6), pages 1790-1808, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:6:p:1790-1808_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367222000815/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:6:p:1790-1808_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.