IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v30y2024i6p1772-1789_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of abusive supervision on turnover intentions: on-the-job embeddedness versus traditional attitudinal constructs

Author

Listed:
  • Ampofo, Emmanuel Twumasi
  • Karatepe, Osman M.

Abstract

Our paper examines whether the impact of abusive supervision on on-the-job embeddedness (JEM) is stronger than on job satisfaction (JSAT), affective organizational commitment (AOC), and turnover intentions. We also examine whether the mediation impact of on-the-JEM in the linkage between abusive supervision and turnover intentions is stronger than the mediation impacts of JSAT and AOC. Data gathered from restaurant service workers in three waves in Ghana were used to test the abovementioned linkages via structural equation modeling. The findings illustrate that all hypotheses are supported. Specifically, the influence of abusive supervision on on-the-JEM is stronger than on traditional attitudinal variables. Additional findings demonstrate that the mediation effect of on-the-JEM in the relationship between abusive supervision and proclivity to quit is stronger than the mediation effects of JSAT and AOC. Implications for theory and managers are offered in our paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Ampofo, Emmanuel Twumasi & Karatepe, Osman M., 2024. "The effect of abusive supervision on turnover intentions: on-the-job embeddedness versus traditional attitudinal constructs," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(6), pages 1772-1789, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:6:p:1772-1789_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367222000803/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:6:p:1772-1789_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.