IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v30y2024i5p1344-1365_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder perceptions in organizational crisis management: exploring alternative configurations

Author

Listed:
  • Contreras-Pacheco, Orlando E.
  • Claasen, Cyrlene
  • Garrigós-Simón, Fernando J.

Abstract

Crises are socially constructed. Affected stakeholders of an organizational crisis conceive complex associations between their perceptions of the implicated company's response and about the company itself. The study moves away from a simple cause–effect view by deriving alternative configurations of these associations. This approach allows for a better understanding of how stakeholders attribute responsibility for a critical event and the resulting crisis faced by the company that caused it. Using partial least squares structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis, we analyze insights of 325 families affected by an environmental incident in 2018 involving Colombia's largest company. We establish a correlation between stakeholders' perceptions of crisis response timeliness and credibility. Accordingly, we expand on how perceptions affect organizational judgments. Finally, we propose that trustworthiness and reputation are antecedents to how organizational crisis response is perceived and how these antecedents affect the degree of the severity of the company crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Contreras-Pacheco, Orlando E. & Claasen, Cyrlene & Garrigós-Simón, Fernando J., 2024. "Stakeholder perceptions in organizational crisis management: exploring alternative configurations," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(5), pages 1344-1365, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:5:p:1344-1365_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367222000554/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:5:p:1344-1365_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.