IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v30y2024i5p1287-1303_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coping with organizational crisis: buffering effects of organization sector prototypicality and employee organizational identification

Author

Listed:
  • Pugliese, Erica
  • Pica, Gennaro
  • Bonaiuto, Flavia
  • Ganucci Cancellieri, Uberta
  • van Knippenberg, Daan
  • Bonaiuto, Marino

Abstract

We explored the interactive role of an organization's sector prototypicality (the extent to which the organization embodies the prototype of its market sector) and employees' identification with their organization in buffering crises' negative effects on perceived organizational performance. We propose (1) that highly prototypical organizations are perceived as more able to cope with organizational crisis, because of their capacity to reduce the threat associated with crisis, and (2) that this effect is augmented when employees more strongly identify with their organization, presumably because of a higher trust in the organization's capacity to efficiently cope with crisis. Findings from two studies confirmed the hypotheses, by manipulating (study 1) and measuring (study 2) organizational crisis and the organization's sector prototypicality, and by focusing on potential employees (study 1) and on employees of a company facing a financial crisis (study 2). Theoretical and applied implications of results are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Pugliese, Erica & Pica, Gennaro & Bonaiuto, Flavia & Ganucci Cancellieri, Uberta & van Knippenberg, Daan & Bonaiuto, Marino, 2024. "Coping with organizational crisis: buffering effects of organization sector prototypicality and employee organizational identification," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(5), pages 1287-1303, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:5:p:1287-1303_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S183336722200030X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:5:p:1287-1303_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.