IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v30y2024i5p1205-1218_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Affect-driven impact of paradoxical leadership on employee organizational citizenship behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Silu
  • Wang, Zhi
  • Zhang, Yu
  • Guo, Kaili

Abstract

Paradoxical leadership is an emerging leadership style which describes leadership behaviours that are ostensibly contradictory but in reality are interrelated and address workplace demands simultaneously and over time. The present study is based on affective events theory (AET), which states that occurrences or events at work result in prompt positive or negative affect in employees. The purpose of the study is to examine the mediating role of positive affect on the relationship between paradoxical leadership and employee organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB). We also examine the moderating role of procedural fairness on the relationship between employee positive affect and OCB. Data collected in two phases in small- and medium-sized Chinese companies indicate that positive affect fully mediates the relationship between paradoxical leadership and employee OCB, and this relationship was found to be stronger when procedural fairness was higher rather than lower. We provide theoretical and practical implications of these findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Silu & Wang, Zhi & Zhang, Yu & Guo, Kaili, 2024. "Affect-driven impact of paradoxical leadership on employee organizational citizenship behaviour," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(5), pages 1205-1218, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:5:p:1205-1218_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367221000572/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:5:p:1205-1218_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.