IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v30y2024i4p792-816_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When does job stress limit organizational citizenship behavior, or not? Personal and contextual resources as buffers

Author

Listed:
  • De Clercq, Dirk
  • Belausteguigoitia, Imanol

Abstract

Anchored in conservation of resources theory, this study considers how employees' experience of job stress might reduce their organizational citizenship behaviors (OCB), as well as how this negative relationship might be buffered by employees' access to two personal resources (passion for work and adaptive humor) and two contextual resources (peer communication and forgiving climate). Data from a Mexican-based organization reveal that felt job stress diminishes OCB, but the effect is subdued at higher levels of the four studied resources. This study accordingly adds to extant research by elucidating when the actual experience of job stress is more or less likely to steer employees away from OCB – that is, when they have access to specific resources that hitherto have been considered direct enablers of such efforts instead of buffers of employees' negative behavioral responses to job stress.

Suggested Citation

  • De Clercq, Dirk & Belausteguigoitia, Imanol, 2024. "When does job stress limit organizational citizenship behavior, or not? Personal and contextual resources as buffers," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(4), pages 792-816, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:4:p:792-816_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367220000073/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:30:y:2024:i:4:p:792-816_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.