IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v29y2023i5p872-892_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Looking at both sides of high-performance work systems and individual performance: a job demands−resources model

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Yuan-Ling
  • Chen, Shyh-Jer

Abstract

In this study, we show how high-performance work systems (HPWS) in an organization can significantly affect employees' creative performance and burnout. To do this, we propose and test a dual-process framework that is based on HR attribution theory, ability−motivation−opportunity theory, micro- and macro-theoretical perspectives, and the job demands−resources (JD-R) model. Using data from a multisource field study with a sample of 311 participants, we found that HPWS benefited employee creative performance and did not lead to employee burnout. However, HPWS affected both job demands and job resources when employees adopted self-protection and self-enhancement strategies. Also, we found that HPWS had unique indirect effects on employee creative performance via job resources whereas job demands fully mediated the relationship between HPWS and employee burnout. The findings shed light on key aspects of HR attribution theory. We discuss accompanying theoretical and practical implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Yuan-Ling & Chen, Shyh-Jer, 2023. "Looking at both sides of high-performance work systems and individual performance: a job demands−resources model," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(5), pages 872-892, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:29:y:2023:i:5:p:872-892_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367221000043/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:29:y:2023:i:5:p:872-892_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.