IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v28y2022i6p1301-1320_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Positive organizational scholarship in healthcare: The impact of employee training on performance, turnover, and stress

Author

Listed:
  • Ertan, Şenay Sahil
  • Şeşen, Harun

Abstract

Based on positive organizational scholarship in healthcare, this study examined the relationships between four dimensions of employee perception of training: workplace stress, organizational outcomes, job performance, and turnover intentions. We hypothesized that employee training perception would have a negative relationship with workplace stress and that stress would mediate the relationship between employee training perception, job performance, and turnover intentions. We obtained data on 317 elderly-care workers in Northern Cyprus and analyzed it using structural equation modeling. Employee training perception was negatively related to workplace stress, and stress was negatively related to job performance and positively related to turnover intention. In line with Job Demand-Resource theory (JD-R), workplace stress partially mediated the relationship between employee training perception and organizational outcomes. The study contributes to the literature by confirming that elderly-care organizations that provide training opportunities for employees can reduce workplace stress, build organizational strengths, and facilitate positive outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ertan, Şenay Sahil & Şeşen, Harun, 2022. "Positive organizational scholarship in healthcare: The impact of employee training on performance, turnover, and stress," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(6), pages 1301-1320, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:28:y:2022:i:6:p:1301-1320_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367219000610/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:28:y:2022:i:6:p:1301-1320_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.