IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v28y2022i5p973-992_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political skill and organizational identification: Preventing role ambiguity from hindering organizational citizenship behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • De Clercq, Dirk
  • Belausteguigoitia, Imanol

Abstract

This research investigates how employees' perceptions of role ambiguity might inhibit their propensity to engage in organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB), with a particular focus on the potential buffering roles of two personal resources in this process: political skill and organizational identification. Survey data collected from a manufacturing organization indicate that role ambiguity diminishes OCB, but this effect is attenuated when employees are equipped with political skill and have a strong sense of belonging to their organization. The buffering role of organizational identification also is particularly strong when employees have adequate political skills, suggesting the reinforcing, buffering roles of these two personal resources. Organizations that want to foster voluntary work behaviours, even if they cannot provide clear role descriptions for their employees, should nurture adequate personal resources within their employee ranks.

Suggested Citation

  • De Clercq, Dirk & Belausteguigoitia, Imanol, 2022. "Political skill and organizational identification: Preventing role ambiguity from hindering organizational citizenship behaviour," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(5), pages 973-992, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:28:y:2022:i:5:p:973-992_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367219000312/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:28:y:2022:i:5:p:973-992_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.