IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v28y2022i4p754-773_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of perceived organisational politics on organisational silence through organisational cynicism: Moderator role of perceived support

Author

Listed:
  • AL-Abrrow, Hadi A.

Abstract

This study examines the effect of perceived organisational politics on organisational silence through the mediating role of organisational cynicism. In addition, it tests the effect of perceived support on this relationship. A quantitative (questionnaire survey) design was used to gather data from 346 employees in three public hospitals in Iraq. The structural equation model was used for data analysis. The results demonstrate that all the major hypotheses were accepted, and important role of perceived support in reversing the positive relationship between perceived organisational politics and organisational cynicism was also highlighted. Furthermore, the mediating role was clear in terms of organisational cynicism and the relationship between perceived organisational politics and organisational silence.

Suggested Citation

  • AL-Abrrow, Hadi A., 2022. "The effect of perceived organisational politics on organisational silence through organisational cynicism: Moderator role of perceived support," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(4), pages 754-773, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:28:y:2022:i:4:p:754-773_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367218000627/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:28:y:2022:i:4:p:754-773_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.