IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v21y2015i06p725-740_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An insider view of the hybrid organisation: How managers respond to challenges of efficiency, legitimacy and meaning

Author

Listed:
  • Johansen, Svein T.
  • Olsen, Trude H.
  • Solstad, Elsa
  • Torsteinsen, Harald

Abstract

In this paper we look at how managers perceive and manage meetings between different institutional logics in three types of hybrid organisations; a savings bank, a municipality and a hospital. The paper contributes to our understanding of organisational hybridity in two ways: First, drawing on Scott’s three institutional pillars, the paper shows how meetings between different institutional logics involve not just the cultural–cognitive pillar, usually highlighted in work on hybrid organisations, but all of them, including the regulative and the normative pillars. Second, the paper suggests a hierarchical relationship between meetings and responses, ranging from less elaborate responses that primarily involve the regulative pillar to more complex and all-encompassing responses that include not only the regulative and the normative but also the cultural–cognitive pillar, triggering questions and issues about identity and purpose.

Suggested Citation

  • Johansen, Svein T. & Olsen, Trude H. & Solstad, Elsa & Torsteinsen, Harald, 2015. "An insider view of the hybrid organisation: How managers respond to challenges of efficiency, legitimacy and meaning," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(6), pages 725-740, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:21:y:2015:i:06:p:725-740_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367215000012/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Philip T. Roundy, 2017. "Hybrid organizations and the logics of entrepreneurial ecosystems," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 1221-1237, December.
    2. Sirris, Stephen, 2019. "Coherent identities and roles? Hybrid professional managers’ prioritizing of coexisting institutional logics in differing contexts," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(4).
    3. Ligorio, Lorenzo & Caputo, Fabio & Venturelli, Andrea, 2022. "Sustainability disclosure and reporting by municipally owned water utilities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Bäker, Agnes & Goodall, Amanda H., 2020. "Feline followers and “umbrella carriers”: Department Chairs’ influence on faculty job satisfaction and quit intentions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(4).
    5. Campanale, Cristina & Cinquini, Lino & Grossi, Giuseppe, 2021. "The role of multiple values in developing management accounting practices in hybrid organisations," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(6).
    6. Tasneem Sadiq & Rob van Tulder & Karen Maas, 2022. "Building a Taxonomy of Hybridization: An Institutional Logics Perspective on Societal Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Charlene L. Nicholls-Nixon & Dave Valliere & Steven A. Gedeon & Sean Wise, 2021. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems and the lifecycle of university business incubators: An integrative case study," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 809-837, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:21:y:2015:i:06:p:725-740_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.