IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v21y2015i01p107-124_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational justice–affective commitment relationship in a team sport setting: The moderating effect of group cohesion

Author

Listed:
  • Ha, Jae-Pil
  • Ha, Jaehyun

Abstract

Using organizational justice literature, the current study aimed to examine the relationship between three dimensions of organizational justice (distributive, procedural, interactional justice) and affective commitment, and to explore the moderating effect of group cohesion on the relationship between the three dimensions of justice and affective commitment in a collegiate team sport context. Data were collected from 253 college student-athletes of two Football Bowl Subdivision institutions in the Southeastern United States. Results of three hierarchical multiple regression analyses indicated that all three dimensions of justice were positively and significantly related to affective commitment. In regard to the moderating effect, group cohesion significantly moderated the distributive justice–affective commitment and the interactional–affective commitment relationships. Specifically, the two significant relationships were significantly stronger for student-athletes who reported high levels of group cohesion than their counterparts. Strategies by coaches to improve athletes’ perceptions of fairness and group cohesion and suggestions for future researches were discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ha, Jae-Pil & Ha, Jaehyun, 2015. "Organizational justice–affective commitment relationship in a team sport setting: The moderating effect of group cohesion," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 107-124, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:21:y:2015:i:01:p:107-124_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367214000674/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Molefe Jonathan Maleka & Ilze Swarts & Magdeline Mmako, 2018. "Happiness Index for Human Resource Management Practitioners Associated with the Professional Body," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 10(5), pages 297-305.
    2. Ying Chen & Xiaohu Zhou & Kim Klyver, 2019. "Collective Efficacy: Linking Paternalistic Leadership to Organizational Commitment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 587-603, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:21:y:2015:i:01:p:107-124_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.