IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v19y2013i06p756-778_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Colleague guanxi intensity: Scale development and validation

Author

Listed:
  • Hong, Chen Huan
  • Zhu, Dauw-Song
  • White, Louis P.

Abstract

This research reviews the constructs and measurements of guanxi and concludes that colleague guanxi is appropriately conceptualized as a multidimensional construct that describes Chinese colleague relationships. The development of a colleague guanxi scale with four dimensions is described. Two studies test the convergent, discriminant, and nomological validity of the guanxi scale. In validation tests guanxi intensity increases with cognition features (subjective fit and cognitive trust) and results in a positive affect (affective trust). Contributions of the colleague guanxi scale are offered.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong, Chen Huan & Zhu, Dauw-Song & White, Louis P., 2013. "Colleague guanxi intensity: Scale development and validation," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(6), pages 756-778, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:19:y:2013:i:06:p:756-778_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367214000145/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tebogo Rahaba Ngoma, 2016. "It is not whom you know, it is how well you know them: Foreign entrepreneurs building close guanxi relationships [Es geht nicht darum, wen du kennst, sondern wie gut du sie kennst: Wie ausländische," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 239-258, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:19:y:2013:i:06:p:756-778_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.