IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v19y1999i02p113-139_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explaining Cross-National Variance in Administrative Reform: Autonomous versus Instrumental Bureaucracies

Author

Listed:
  • Knill, Christoph

Abstract

Notwithstanding an ever-growing body of literature on administrative reforms, the studies either focus on single countries or emphasize common tendencies in all countries; hence providing little systematic insight for the evaluation and explanation of administrative change from a comparative perspective. In the light of this deficit, it is the aim of this article to develop an analytical concept for explaining cross-national variances in patterns of administrative development. For this purpose, the concept of national administrative reform capacity is developed, arguing that the potential for reforming different administrative systems is basically dependent on the general institutional context in which these systems are embedded. On this basis, two ideal type constellations of administrative reform capacity and corresponding patterns of administrative development are identified and illustrated by a systematic comparison of administrative reform capacities and administrative changes in Germany and Britain.

Suggested Citation

  • Knill, Christoph, 1999. "Explaining Cross-National Variance in Administrative Reform: Autonomous versus Instrumental Bureaucracies," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 113-139, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:19:y:1999:i:02:p:113-139_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X99000203/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tietmeyer, Jan, 2021. "Marktversagen im Neuen Steuerungsmodell - eine wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Betrachtung des Ambulant Betreuten Wohnens in der Eingliederungshilfe für Menschen mit Behinderung in NRW," ifpm Schriftenreihe, FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, ifpm Institut für Public Management, volume 2, number 2 edited by FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, ifpm Institut für Public Management.
    2. Philippe Bezes & Gilles Jeannot, 2016. "From Smooth NPMization to Structural Changes in France: Accelerated Reforms, Mixed Perceptions," Post-Print hal-01340206, HAL.
    3. Kristian Krieger, 2013. "The limits and variety of risk‐based governance: The case of flood management in Germany and England," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 236-257, June.
    4. Soonae Park & Don S. Lee & Jieun Son, 2021. "Regulatory reform in the era of new technological development: The role of organizational factors in the public sector," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 894-908, July.
    5. Michael Howlett, 2014. "From the ‘old’ to the ‘new’ policy design: design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 47(3), pages 187-207, September.
    6. Breuer, Sophie & Tietmeyer, Jan, 2024. "Berufseinstieg im Jugendamt - empirische Befunde zu Herausforderungen und Lösungsansätzen," ifpm Schriftenreihe, FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, ifpm Institut für Public Management, volume 6, number 300256 edited by FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, ifpm Institut für Public Management.
    7. Lisa Hansson & Lena Nerhagen, 2019. "Regulatory Measurements in Policy Coordinated Practices: The Case of Promoting Renewable Energy and Cleaner Transport in Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Huma Siddiqi, 2021. "Understanding the Causes of Variance in Provincial Response to COVID-19 in Pakistan by Using the Policy Capacity Framework," South Asian Survey, , vol. 28(1), pages 133-156, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:19:y:1999:i:02:p:113-139_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.