IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v53y2018i04p1679-1714_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Playing Favorites? Industry Expert Directors in Diversified Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Ellis, Jesse A.
  • Fee, C. Edward
  • Thomas, Shawn

Abstract

We examine the influence of outside directors’ industry experience on segment investment, segment operating performance, and firm valuation for conglomerates. Given board composition is endogenous, we instrument for the presence of industry expert directors using the supply of experienced executives near conglomerate firms’ headquarters. We find that industry expert representation on the board causes increased segment investment. Consistent with experienced directors playing favorites rather than acting as dispassionate advisors, segment profitability (firm value) is lower for segments (firms) with industry expert outside directors. We do not find analogous negative profitability or valuation effects of director experience for single-segment firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Ellis, Jesse A. & Fee, C. Edward & Thomas, Shawn, 2018. "Playing Favorites? Industry Expert Directors in Diversified Firms," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(4), pages 1679-1714, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:53:y:2018:i:04:p:1679-1714_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109018000169/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ormazabal, Gaizka, 2018. "Are directors more likely to relinquish their riskiest directorships after the Financial Crisis?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1-20.
    2. Yang Fan, 2024. "Board diversity of industry expertise: impacts on strategic change and product markets," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 421-447, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:53:y:2018:i:04:p:1679-1714_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.