IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v45y2010i05p1221-1251_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information, Expected Utility, and Portfolio Choice

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Jun
  • Peleg, Ehud
  • Subrahmanyam, Avanidhar

Abstract

We study the consumption-investment problem of an agent with a constant relative risk aversion preference function, who possesses noisy information about the future prospects of a stock. We also solve for the value of information to the agent in closed form. We find that information can significantly alter consumption and asset allocation decisions. For reasonable parameter ranges, information increases consumption in the vicinity of 25%. Information can shift the portfolio weight on a stock from 0% to around 70%. Thus, depending on the stock beta, the weight on the market portfolio can be considerably reduced with information, causing the appearance of underdiversification. The model indicates that stock holdings of informed agents are positively related to wealth, unrelated to systematic risk, and negatively related to idiosyncratic uncertainty. We also show that the dollar value of information to the agent depends linearly on his wealth and decreases with both the propensity to intermediate consumption and risk aversion.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Jun & Peleg, Ehud & Subrahmanyam, Avanidhar, 2010. "Information, Expected Utility, and Portfolio Choice," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(5), pages 1221-1251, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:45:y:2010:i:05:p:1221-1251_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S002210901000044X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guo, Ming & Ou-Yang, Hui, 2021. "Alpha decay and Sharpe ratio: Two measures of investor performance," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    2. Huy N. Chau & Andrea Cosso & Claudio Fontana, 2018. "The value of informational arbitrage," Papers 1804.00442, arXiv.org.
    3. Branger, Nicole & Kraft, Holger & Meinerding, Christoph, 2014. "Partial information about contagion risk, self-exciting processes and portfolio optimization," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 18-36.
    4. Huy N. Chau & Andrea Cosso & Claudio Fontana, 2020. "The value of informational arbitrage," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 277-307, April.
    5. Lioui, Abraham, 2013. "Time consistent vs. time inconsistent dynamic asset allocation: Some utility cost calculations for mean variance preferences," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 1066-1096.
    6. Sastry, Ravi & Thompson, Rex, 2019. "Strategic trading with risk aversion and information flow," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-16.
    7. Peng, Xingchun & Chen, Fenge & Wang, Wenyuan, 2021. "Robust optimal investment and reinsurance for an insurer with inside information," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 15-30.
    8. Daniel Andrei & Michael Hasler, 2020. "Dynamic Attention Behavior Under Return Predictability," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(7), pages 2906-2928, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:45:y:2010:i:05:p:1221-1251_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.