IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v19y1984i03p329-338_02.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gini's Mean Difference and Portfolio Selection: An Empirical Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Bey, Roger P.
  • Howe, Keith M.

Abstract

Yitzhaki [19] recently developed two portfolio selection criteria (EG and EΓ) based on the mean and Gini's mean difference. Similar to mean-variance(EV), the EG criterion uses two summary statistics to describe the probability distribution of a risky prospect, the mean and one-half Gini's mean difference. Gini's mean difference is defined as the average of the absolute differences between all possible pairs of observations of a random variable. Yitzhaki's development concentrated on the theoretical aspects of EG and EΓ and the theoretical relationships among EG, EΓ, EV, and stochastic dominance (SD) selection criteria. He did not address either the empirical properties of EG and EΓ or the relationship between the empirical efficient sets of EG and EΓ and other portfolio selection criteria. Yitzhaki suggested that the next step in the development and application of his proposed selection criteria should be an empirical investigation of how the EG and EΓ criteria compare with other selection criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • Bey, Roger P. & Howe, Keith M., 1984. "Gini's Mean Difference and Portfolio Selection: An Empirical Evaluation," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 329-338, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:19:y:1984:i:03:p:329-338_02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109000020421/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adler Haymans Manurung & Nera Marinda Machdar & Jadongan Sijabat & Amran Manurung, 2024. "The Construction of a Portfolio Using Varying Methods and the Effects of Variables on Portfolio Return," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(1), pages 233-241, January.
    2. Darren Butterworth & Phil Holmes, 2005. "The Hedging Effectiveness of U.K. Stock Index Futures Contracts Using an Extended Mean Gini Approach: Evidence for the FTSE 100 and FTSE Mid250 Contracts," Multinational Finance Journal, Multinational Finance Journal, vol. 9(3-4), pages 131-160, September.
    3. Shalit, Haim & Yitzhaki, Shlomo, 1985. "Evaluating the Mean-Gini Approach to Portfolio Selection," Working Papers 232632, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Center for Agricultural Economic Research.
    4. Haim Shalit & Shlomo Yitzhaki, 2009. "Capital market equilibrium with heterogeneous investors," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(6), pages 757-766.
    5. Haim Shalit & Shlomo Yitzhaki, 2005. "Capital Market Equilibrium: The Mean-Gini Approach," Working Papers 0522, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
    6. Wetzstein, Michael E. & Szmedra, Philip I. & McClendon, Ronald W. & Edwards, David M., 1988. "Efficiency Criteria And Risk Aversion: An Empirical Evaluation," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 20(1), pages 1-8, July.
    7. Ran Ji & Miguel A. Lejeune & Srinivas Y. Prasad, 2017. "Properties, formulations, and algorithms for portfolio optimization using Mean-Gini criteria," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 248(1), pages 305-343, January.
    8. Adler Haymans MANURUNG & Fadh Fauzi HIBATULLAH & Jadongan SIJABAT, 2023. "Stock Selection Using Roy Criteria to Construct a Portfolio and the Effects of Variables on Portfolio Return," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 12(3), pages 1-2.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:19:y:1984:i:03:p:329-338_02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.