IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v14y1979i05p925-938_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient Portfolios and Superfluous Diversification

Author

Listed:
  • Frankfurter, George M.
  • Frecka, Thomas J.

Abstract

In this study, alternative real and simulated market indexes are examined as proxies for the “common factor†required by the Sharpe portfolio selection model [13]. The ex post performance of efficient and well-diversified portfolios generated by the model based on the different indexes is compared. The results indicate no significant difference in performance between real and simulated indexes, although the degree of diversification is much lower for portfolios based on indexes which relate well to the universe of securities. It is also shown that portfolios which are selected according to the Sharpe model (regardless of the index) outperform strategies which call for investing in the market portfolio.

Suggested Citation

  • Frankfurter, George M. & Frecka, Thomas J., 1979. "Efficient Portfolios and Superfluous Diversification," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(5), pages 925-938, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:14:y:1979:i:05:p:925-938_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109000005895/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William P. Lloyd & John H. Hand & Naval K. Modani, 1981. "The Effect Of Portfolio Construction Rules On The Relationship Between Portfolio Size And Effective Diversification," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 4(3), pages 183-193, September.
    2. McGoun, Elton G., 1997. "Ex ungue leonem," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:14:y:1979:i:05:p:925-938_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.