IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v10y1975i05p813-820_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Sample Sizes on the Accuracy of EV and SSD Efficiency Criteria

Author

Listed:
  • Johnson, Keith H.
  • Burgess, Richard C.

Abstract

Preference orderings of uncertain prospects have progressed from the two-moment EV model first developed by Markowitz [1952] to the more general efficiency analysis that is based on the entire probability function. This general efficiency approach, referred to as the Stochastic Dominance (SD) approach, does not depend on specific assumptions about the investor's utility function and has been shown to be theoretically superior to the “moment methods” [1].

Suggested Citation

  • Johnson, Keith H. & Burgess, Richard C., 1975. "The Effects of Sample Sizes on the Accuracy of EV and SSD Efficiency Criteria," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(5), pages 813-820, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:10:y:1975:i:05:p:813-820_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109000018937/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William E. Stein & Roger C. Pfaffenberger & Dan W. French, 1987. "Sampling Error In First Order Stochastic Dominance," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 10(3), pages 259-268, September.
    2. Richard C. Burgess & Maurry J. Tamarkin, 1982. "Regulatory Influences On Portfolio Performance: Short Selling And Regulation T," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 5(1), pages 39-54, March.
    3. Roger P. Bey & Richard C. Burgess & Richard B. Kearns, 1984. "Moving Stochastic Dominance: An Alternative Method For Testing Market Efficiency," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 7(3), pages 185-196, September.
    4. Cochran, Mark J., 1986. "Stochastic Dominance: The State Of The Art In Agricultural Economics," Regional Research Projects > 1986: S-180 Annual Meeting, March 23-26, 1986, Tampa, Florida 271995, Regional Research Projects > S-180: An Economic Analysis of Risk Management Strategies for Agricultural Production Firms.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:10:y:1975:i:05:p:813-820_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.