IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v10y1975i01p1-20_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Cost of Capital, Capital Budgeting, and the Maximization of Shareholder Wealth

Author

Listed:
  • Beranek, William

Abstract

The need for a corporate marginal cost of capital to be used for internal accept-reject decisions (either as a rate of discount for net-present-value (NPV) computations or as a “cut-off” rate with the internal rate of return (IRR) criterion) has led numerous textbook writers to advocate some variant of a weighted average cost of capital. These authors agree substantially on how costs of individual sources of capital are to be assessed but are uncertain of how the weights should be determined, whether they should reflect the firm's existing capital structure, a target structure, or the mix, however determined, in the firm's forthcoming capital budget, and whether they should be based on book or market values. Moreover, it is not obvious how book or even market values should be measured. These writers have not proven that their intuitively held definitions do in general, for capital budgeting, imply maximizing shareholder wealth.

Suggested Citation

  • Beranek, William, 1975. "The Cost of Capital, Capital Budgeting, and the Maximization of Shareholder Wealth," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:10:y:1975:i:01:p:1-20_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109000018056/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bradford, Garnett L. & Miller, Stephen E., 1998. "An Analysis Of Alternative Net Present Value Capital Investment Decision Models," Working Papers 18804, Clemson University, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    2. Juha Laitila & Robert Prinz & Lauri Sikanen, 2019. "Selection of a chipper technology for small-scale operations - a Finnish case," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(4), pages 121-133.
    3. Keef, Stephen P & Khaled, Mohammed S & Roush, Melvin L, 2011. "Miller's (2009) WACC model: An extension," Working Paper Series 1995, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.
    4. Keef, Stephen P & Khaled, Mohammed S & Roush, Melvin L, 2011. "Miller's (2009) WACC model: An extension," Working Paper Series 18608, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:10:y:1975:i:01:p:1-20_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.