IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jechis/v44y1984i03p775-799_03.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technological Change as Historical Process: The Case of the U.S. Pulp and Paper Industry, 1915–1940

Author

Listed:
  • Cohen, Avi J.

Abstract

Technological changes in the U.S. pulp and paper industry between 1915 and 1940 are chronicled, and three patterns—evolutionary bias, output-increasing innovation in response to technological disequilibria, and differences in the timing of innovations between the 1920s and 1930s—are identified and explained by means of a theoretical framework for induced innovation. The framework conceptualizes technological change as a means for growth-seeking firms to overcome barriers to accumulation and provides a general explanation of induced innovation that is situated in historical time.

Suggested Citation

  • Cohen, Avi J., 1984. "Technological Change as Historical Process: The Case of the U.S. Pulp and Paper Industry, 1915–1940," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(3), pages 775-799, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jechis:v:44:y:1984:i:03:p:775-799_03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022050700032368/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miquel Gutiérrez-Poch, 2017. "British papermaking engineering, its growth and the origins of its decline, 1800-1939: a comparative approach," Working Papers 17004, Economic History Society.
    2. Ricardo Fitas & Heinz Joachim Schaffrath & Samuel Schabel, 2023. "A Review of Optimization for Corrugated Boards," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-27, November.
    3. Beaudreau, Bernard C., 2017. "The economies of speed, KE=1/2mv2 and the productivity slowdown," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 100-113.
    4. Figueiredo, Paulo N., 2016. "Evolution of the short-fiber technological trajectory in Brazil's pulp and paper industry: The role of firm-level innovative capability-building and indigenous institutions," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 1-14.
    5. Lampel, Joseph & Miller, Roger & Floricel, Serghei, 1996. "Impact of owner involvement on innovation in large projects: Lessons from power plants construction," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 5(6), pages 561-578, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jechis:v:44:y:1984:i:03:p:775-799_03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jeh .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.