IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jagaec/v11y1979i02p97-102_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating Recreation Values Associated With Land Use Changes

Author

Listed:
  • Musser, Wesley N.
  • Ziemer, Rod F.

Abstract

Achieving optimal use of wildlife resources is a classic problem in natural resource economics. Ciriacy-Wantrup argued that wildlife resources are a case of a fugitive resource for which private property rights cannot easily be defined and therefore government policy may be necessary to obtain optimal use [5, pp. 141–145]. Land use planning is one area of government policy in which limited attention has been given to management of wildlife resources. One reason for the neglect may be the lack of emphasis on estimating the value of wildlife recreation experiences associated with particular land uses. An exception is the work of Martin, Tinney, and Gum [16] who did not look at marginal land use changes but did consider the termination of all cattle ranching in Arizona and its effect on recreational and agricultural economic surpluses.

Suggested Citation

  • Musser, Wesley N. & Ziemer, Rod F., 1979. "Estimating Recreation Values Associated With Land Use Changes," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 97-102, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:11:y:1979:i:02:p:97-102_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0081305200015090/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas F. Hogarty & Robert J. Mackay, 1975. "Some Implications of the "New Theory of Consumer Behavior" for Interpreting Estimated Demand Elasticities," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 57(2), pages 340-343.
    2. Robert N. Shulstad & Herbert H. Stoevener, 1978. "The Effects of Mercury Contamination in Pheasants on the Value of Pheasant Hunting in Oregon," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 54(1), pages 39-49.
    3. Martin, William E. & Tinney, J. Craig & Gum, Russell L., 1978. "A Welfare Economic Analysis Of The Potential Competition Between Hunting And Cattle Ranching," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 3(2), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Kenneth E. McConnell, 1977. "Congestion and Willingness to Pay: A Study of Beach Use," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 53(2), pages 185-195.
    5. Russell L. Gum & William E. Martin, 1975. "Problems and Solutions in Estimating the Demand for and Value of Rural Outdoor Recreation," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 57(4), pages 558-566.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Livengood, Kerry R., 1981. "Bias in Recreation Benefit Estimates: Further Evidence," 1981 Annual Meeting, July 26-29, Clemson, South Carolina 279406, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Bergland, Olvar & Kim, Seung-Woo & McLeod, Don & Romstad, Eirik, 1989. "Estimation of Optimal Congestion Levels: Deer Hunting in Western Oregon," 1989 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 2, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 270485, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Cory, Dennis C. & Martin, William E., 1985. "Valuing Wildlife For Efficient Multiple Use: Elk Versus Cattle," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Witte, Kristof De & Geys, Benny, 2011. "Evaluating efficient public good provision: Theory and evidence from a generalised conditional efficiency model for public libraries," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 319-327, May.
    5. Allen, P. Geoffrey & Stevens, Thomas H., 1979. "The Economics Of Outdoor Recreation Congestion: A Case Study Of Camping," Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 0(Number 1), pages 1-4, April.
    6. Richard T. Carson, 2011. "Contingent Valuation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2489.
    7. Aljohani, Khalid & Thompson, Russell G., 2021. "Modelling individual preferences of goods receivers for a Receiver-led delivery consolidation service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 74-94.
    8. Michael, Jeffrey A. & Reiling, Stephen D., 1997. "The Role Of Expectations And Heterogeneous Preferences For Congestion In The Valuation Of Recreation Benefits," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 26(2), pages 1-8, October.
    9. Seong-Hoon Cho & J.M. Bowker & Roland K. Roberts & Seunggyu Kim & Taeyoung Kim & Dayton M. Lambert, 2015. "Effects on Consumer Welfare of Visitor Satisfaction with Recreation Information Availability: A Case Study of the Allegheny National Forest," Tourism Economics, , vol. 21(4), pages 853-869, August.
    10. Smith, Mark E. & Ravenswaay, Eileen O. van & Thompson, Stanley R., 1984. "The Economic Consequences of Food Contamination: A Case Study of Heptachlor Contamination of Oahu Milk: Appendix 1," Agricultural Economic Report Series 201337, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    11. Richard C. Bishop & Kevin J. Boyle, 2019. "Reliability and Validity in Nonmarket Valuation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 72(2), pages 559-582, February.
    12. Xin Yang & Anlu Zhang & Fan Zhang, 2019. "Farmers’ Heterogeneous Willingness to Pay for Farmland Non-Market Goods and Services on the Basis of a Mixed Logit Model—A Case Study of Wuhan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-14, October.
    13. F. Reed Johnson, 1988. "Economic Costs of Misinforming About Risk: The EDB Scare and the Media," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(2), pages 261-269, June.
    14. repec:rre:publsh:v:40:y:2010:i:3:p:273-286 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Pope, C. Arden & Stoll, John R., 1985. "The Market Value of Ingress Rights for White-Tailed Deer Hunting in Texas," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(1), pages 177-182, July.
    16. Hueth, Darrell & Strong, Elizabeth J., 1984. "A Critical Review Of The Travel Cost, Hedonic Travel Cost, And Household Production Models For Measurement Of Quality Changes In Recreational Experiences," 1984 Annual Meeting, August 5-8, Ithaca, New York 278942, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Fredric C. Menz & John K. Mullen, 1981. "The Economics of Congestion: a Comment," Public Finance Review, , vol. 9(1), pages 107-116, January.
    18. Walsh, Richard G. & Gilliam, Lynde O., 1982. "Benefits Of Wilderness Expansion With Excess Demand For Indian Peaks," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 7(01), pages 1-12, July.
    19. Peter Schuhmann & Kurt Schwabe, 2004. "An Analysis of Congestion Measures and Heterogeneous Angler Preferences in a Random Utility Model of Recreational Fishing," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 27(4), pages 429-450, April.
    20. Heiman, Amir & Lowengart, Oded, 2008. "The effect of information about health hazards on demand for frequently purchased commodities," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 310-318.
    21. Morey, Edward R. & Kritzberg, David, 2012. "It's not where you do it, it's who you do it with?," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 176-191.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:11:y:1979:i:02:p:97-102_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.