IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/intorg/v62y2008i04p717-736_08.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ensuring Peace: Foreign-Imposed Regime Change and Postwar Peace Duration, 1914–2001

Author

Listed:
  • Lo, Nigel
  • Hashimoto, Barry
  • Reiter, Dan

Abstract

This research note develops a new explanation of postwar peace duration: periods of peace following wars last longer when the war ends in foreign-imposed regime change. This study tests this hypothesis on a new data set (an expansion of Fortna's (2004) data) of all periods of peace following interstate war cease-fires, over the period 1914–2001. It also tests for other possible factors affecting postwar peace duration, including international institutions, the revelation of information during war, third-party intervention during war, postwar changes in the balance of power, regime type, past conflict history, and others. The article finds strong support for the central hypothesis that peace lasts longer following wars that end in foreign-imposed regime change. This pacifying effect diminishes over time when a puppet is imposed, but not when a democracy is imposed. There are other results, including that the strength of a cease-fire agreement has almost no impact on peace duration.

Suggested Citation

  • Lo, Nigel & Hashimoto, Barry & Reiter, Dan, 2008. "Ensuring Peace: Foreign-Imposed Regime Change and Postwar Peace Duration, 1914–2001," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 62(4), pages 717-736, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:62:y:2008:i:04:p:717-736_08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020818308080259/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jeff Colgan, 2012. "Measuring Revolution," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 29(4), pages 444-467, September.
    2. Toke S. Aidt & Facundo Albornoz & Esther Hauk, 2019. "Foreign in influence and domestic policy: A survey," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1928, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    3. Toke S. Aidt & Facundo Albornoz & Esther Hauk, 2021. "Foreign Influence and Domestic Policy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 59(2), pages 426-487, June.
    4. Danielle Villa & Daniel Arnon & Dan Reiter, 2022. "Causes of Foreign-Imposed Regime Change: The Signal of Economic Expropriation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 66(4-5), pages 651-676, May.
    5. Philip Arena & Anna O. Pechenkina, 2016. "External Subsidies and Lasting Peace," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 60(7), pages 1278-1311, October.
    6. Michaela Mattes & Burcu Savun, 2010. "Information, Agreement Design, and the Durability of Civil War Settlements," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(2), pages 511-524, April.
    7. KAGOTANI Koji & ONO Yoshikuni, 2020. "Diplomatic Protest and Patriotism: The Effect of Foreign Voices on Japanese Public Opinion," Discussion papers 20046, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    8. Stephen L. Quackenbush, 2016. "Centers of gravity and war outcomes," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 33(4), pages 361-380, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:62:y:2008:i:04:p:717-736_08. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ino .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.